And why do you use them?

  • Eugenia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    KDEnLive is a good “editor” for simpler projects, but not a good video editing “suite”. It comes nowhere near Resolve’s color grading ability, or even audio editing ability these days. And it has no compositing ability at all. In fact, except Natron on Linux (that gets updated once every 2-3 years with just bug fixes and not many features), there’s nothing about compositing. Blender’s compositing is unusable btw.

    • @delirious_owl@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Is it really too hard to import audio tracks after editing in audacity. I’m glad kdenlive doesn’t waste time trying to be an audio editor.

      • Eugenia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        You misunderstand the word “editing” in this case. It’s not a matter of adding a few plugins and cutting audio. It’s a matter of having the tools to normalize human voice in a way that it’s expected in a movie, or to have automation about it, or envelopes that tracks the volume and fixes it for you. That’s the stuff that neither audacity nor kdenlive has, because they’re very specific to the movie industry. They have more generic plugins instead.

        • @delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Where can I learn more about how human voice is normalized for movies? I’ve noticed a big difference in the audio of old movies and some shows, and modern high-budget movies. But I can never pinpoint the difference

          • Eugenia
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            That’s mostly due to the difference in recording equipment rather than editing.