• @Decimit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    3261 year ago

    Pirating went down when paying for streaming was more convenient. Well, you are making it far less convenient.

    • @Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1081 year ago

      Streaming has become cable 2.0.

      It was wonderful when everything was on one, maybe two providers. Could watch everything in a very easy, very affordable way.

      But everyone saw that, went “I know, I want that money!” and spent billions building their own individual infrastructures so make their own streaming services, and right around we go right back to the absolute worst days of cable and bullshit.

      Only thing stopping me from saying fuck it and downloading shit I want to watch, is the fact that I no longer know what the good sites are… since I havent pirated since the heyday of the bay.

      • @Khotetsu@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        And the irony is that people switched to cable for the exact same reason. They got tired of the nonsense that broadcast TV pulled with subscriptions for different channels and all the ads and everything, and went to cable because you paid one bill for every channel. Then, everyone moved to streaming because you had to buy 50 different cable packages for the one channel on each you actually cared about, and there were just too many ads to deal with, etc.

        Something something, those who don’t listen to history are doomed to lose profit margins or whatever.

        • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Broadcast tv had different subscriptions for channels? Where? Free to air tv is free with no subscriptions or options.

          • @Khotetsu@lib.lgbt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            I may be remembering that wrong, as it was before my time, but I had heard that people moved to cable for the same reasons that people moved from cable to streaming services. You bought one cable package, it gave you access to everything, and there were no ads. Then came the ads, and eventually, the packages you have to buy in addition to your cable subscription for the channels you actually care about.

            • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              People went to cable because it had no ads and let you have the opportunity to watch stuff you’d missed because they looped content regularly. Missed an episode of the Simpsons? All good, it’s on again in 12 hours. It also has movies and shows long before free to air because they paid for it. Cable was the start of subscriptions and paying for individual channels.

      • @hypnotoad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        That and movies just suck nowadays. This is partially old man yelling at cloud stuff but also true since the death of DVD’s means studios won’t take risks anymore since they can’t recoup funds after a poor box office.

        • TurtleJoe
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          This isn’t yelling at clouds, it’s check l correct.

          It’s also not quite so much “recoup funds at a poor box office” as it was “count on DVD sales to make up fifty percent of revenue for certain kinds of movies.”

        • @cor315@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I can’t tell if no one talks about usenet because no one knows about it or because they don’t want anyone else to know about it.

          • @ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I prefer torrents because it’s totally free, unlike Usenet. I don’t even pay for a VPN since I don’t care about a few love letters in my inbox. It’s not about the cost; it’s a matter of principle that I disagree with commercialized piracy.

            But Usenet is a good option for other reasons.

    • @jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      Well, this time they have Google and Microsoft on big brother duty to make sure you don’t get crazy ideas. And I’m not seeing enough people jumping away from Chrome and Windows to stop it.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        331 year ago

        I’m on Windows and it’s never hindered me when I needed to go download something that would make a studio exec cry. Granted, I use Firefox, but I’m not sure what Chrome would do differently - it’s just a matter of clicking links that get sent off to qBittorrent to handle. What “big brothering” do they do?

        • @4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Google is implementing a new scheme that verifies your browser (correct DRM, etc.) and sites won’t allow access without it.

          Basically you have to have Chrome and without extensions they don’t like.

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            141 year ago

            I’m preeeeetty sure that the Pirate Bay isn’t going to implement that scheme.

      • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        But so far google and microsoft are incompetent big brothers, to the point that most people will find free streaming sites just by searching “free streaming epx of show”. Now we are not talking good streaming, or even safe but if you want an example just look at any place with poor users (like a school or library).

      • @duncesplayed
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        True as long as they keep an ad-free tier.