• Possibly linuxOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29 months ago

    F-droid rejects any code that doesn’t respect you basic freedom.

    • アルケミー船長
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Freedom from what? Good security practices? Open source does not equal security nor freedom. You’re pedaling digital politics instead of fact based privacy and security. Trust me I’d love my apps to be open source but ignoring blatant security issues is going to put someone at risk. You can’t have privacy without security and vice versa.

      edit: like I mentioned previously, use obtainium and you can still use open source software

            • @jack@monero.town
              link
              fedilink
              59 months ago

              Open source gives you all the freedoms that free software gives. So it factually equates. You are also spreading the misinformation that F-Droid guarantees that the software there is 100% libre even when it is an external repo. Totally wrong.

              You are trying to tell me that caring about free software is misinformation now?

              When did I say that? Are you stupid?

              You can’t convince people when you are just repeating what Stallman says without understanding it.

              • Possibly linuxOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                19 months ago

                Open source doesn’t necessarily give you the freedoms the free software gives. Open source just means you can use the source code. Free software means it grants you the 4 freedoms and respects your ability to modify and distribute the code.

                My problem with signal is they discourage forking and modifying the source or using modified versions of the code. I assume this is one of the reasons they don’t have signal on F-droid.

                Also F-droid allows you to get your programs from any repo. It is up to you not to add bad repos. Molly has a lot of encouraging things about it that make it more trustworthy for me. The main thing I like is there fully Foss version.

        • アルケミー船長
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          There is no completely free software, even if you take out the Intel ME (which is a very bad idea as it’ll leave you super vulnerable) The Intel chip will never be open source or FOSS at a hardware level. Even RISC-5 being open still has trust issues. Unless you setup a chip fab you’re at the helm of someone. And as the closed source hardware runs the open source software, is it really free?

          • Possibly linuxOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Therefore we shouldn’t even try? I do my best to steer clear of proprietary software.

            • アルケミー船長
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Like everything in life it’s about balance, using too much foss software and hardware could put you in much more risk, while using proprietary software won’t give you the control or privacy you want. Once again foss software is great, but it is not perfect and should not be treated as such.