• @set_secret@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    310 months ago

    anyone who’s not already on board the climate change cause is either too stupid or too rich to care. neither of which can be fixed.

        • @Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          310 months ago

          Oh, there is no implication about it: you need one hell of a justification to deliberately infringe on freedom of movement. It should be a criminal offense on the same level as “harassment” or “simple assault” to deliberately prevent someone from traveling. Each of these protesters should be charged with a separate count for each and every vehicle so delayed.

          And, anyone so impeded should be justified in using any force necessary to end that unlawful impediment.

          • Bro, you can justify killing little old ladies crossing the street with that argument.

            Just admit all you care about is yourself and getting from point A to point B and that right to protest doesn’t actually matter to you.

            • @Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Reasonable person standard applies to all use of force, so no, not really.

              The right to protest does not extend to infringing on the rights of another. My right to protest does not supersede your right to leave your home and travel in public. I cannot detain you or deny your free movement.

              You do not have a monopoly on the use of public roads, sidewalks, etc. “Taking” the public roads or sidewalks for your private use is not reasonable.

              • So in other words you really don’t care.

                Pedestrians always have right of way regardless of why they’re on the street, to start…

                And the right to protest does protect their right to inconvenience you when on the road. Don’t like it, just turn around or go park your car and walk.