• brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    9 months ago

    Isn’t this the story of the original Gwen Stacy? Spiderman tries to save her, but does exactly this and the force on her body kills her anyway.

    It’s been a long, long time since I have read the comics but iirc, it was a defining point in the spiderman canon.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 months ago

      It wasn’t originally. It was essentially the scene from the first Spider Man movie where Goblin makes Spidey swoop in to save her, but she was already dead.

      They retconned it later to make it so Spidey killed her, which is a better story.

      • kronisk @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s the other way around, actually.

        In The Amazing Spider-Man #125 (Oct. 1973), Marvel Comics editor Roy Thomas wrote in the letters column that “it saddens us to have to say that the whiplash effect she underwent when Spidey’s webbing stopped her so suddenly was, in fact, what killed her. In short, it was impossible for Peter to save her. He couldn’t have swung down in time; the action he did take resulted in her death; if he had done nothing, she still would certainly have perished. There was no way out.” Source

        The comic (#121) is ambiguous though. There is really no way for the reader to know whether she was dead before her neck was snapped, Green Goblin certainly seems to think so (but he is hardly a reliable source). But snapping her neck certainly would have killed her anyway.

          • kronisk @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            If you read my comment, I said it’s ambiguous if she was already dead when her neck was snapped, not that her neck was in fact snapped.

            • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’m disagreeing. The ambiguity was retconned later because Marvel didn’t want to commit to Spider-Man “causing” her death.

              In the original comic, she is alive and looks like she’s in a state of shock according to Peter. Goblin even threatens to kill her, further confirming she is alive. She gets pushed over the edge of the bridge, and he neck is snapped when the web stops her fall. The clear intent in the story telling is that she is alive until the snap. You even quote Roy Thomas stating as such in print a few episodes later.

              • kronisk @lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                OK, now I understand what you’re getting at and I don’t disagree actually. I also think that the original intent was that she died of a broken neck but the ambiguity is there, whether by design or accident, which makes other theories and later retconning possible. I personally suspect they made it a bit ambiguous to give themselves a bit of a back door in case the public would react too harshly to Spidey accidentally kiling his girlfriend. One has to remember how unexpected and grim this was at the time, it was a huge risk to take for the writers (Stan Lee even said later that he was tricked into OKing it while he was packing for a trip…not sure I believe that though).

                It would have been easy to make her perhaps say something or make a sound when she’s lying on the edge of the bridge, or make Peter feel her pulse to confirm she was alive before the fall. As the scene unfolds now, and the way she is drawn when lying on the edge (she looks dead), I feel its unlikely that wasn’t intentional. But this is ultimately a matter of interpretation.

      • Miphera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        I just rewatched the scene on YT, and he’s actually just a bit too late, and her head slams into the ground with full force.

        • Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          I was thinking of the comic, but I guess it makes sense tocdo it that way in a movie meant for kids. A neck snapping might be a bit grim

            • Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t experience it myself, so I couldn’t say why it is the case, but I’ve known people who felt more freaked out or unsettled by things like death via necks snapping. If I were to try and guess, maybe it is easier to process direct impact causing lethal trauma than something that seems less… sonething? Idk. Maybe someone who has experienced this can explain.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          If we are talking emma stone, she is specifically shown hitting her head during the whiplash which is what kills her

          • Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            I was referring to the original version in the comic. I haven’t followed all the revisions and alternate universes to know the variations.

        • NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          There is. You just need to spread out the deceleration from a few centimeters to a few meters in the falling direction, and make sure the force is being applied all over their body, not just a few spots (think bouncy castle vs rebar).

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        Generally when people postike this, on an open forum, they’re asking readers in general. It wasn’t directed specifically at you, but was a response to what you said.