• Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is the part I absolutely don’t get about this. Plus windows create a better visual boundary for the context-switch tab groups are supposed to be as you minimize one and restore another.

        Why not just use windows? 🤷 I sure hope they keep the implementation of this simple and end up just doing that for the user. Create new tab group -> color-coded new window opens up, gently nudging the user towards how simple the solution to their problem actually is.

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Tab groups in chrome are something I dearly miss from chrome. It’s super convenient for grouping projects and quickly switching between them. Multiple windows is a worse experience: there’s no preview favicon or anything to indicate what a window is actually for until you hover over it. With a tab I can see at a glance what something is before I switch.

    • ignism@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 months ago

      I really don’t understand people who don’t close tabs. I start with a fresh browser window multiple times per day.

      • Lag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 months ago

        We start with a fresh browser window multiple times per day too. Except we also have multiple other windows of tabs minimized already.

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          This reminds me that I once “accidentally” closed about half of those windows - each ~200 tabs - of my then GF. Took her over a month to notice. Tells you all about how useful tab hoarding actually is.

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          You’re right, I don’t. And since browsers come with this really neat feature called “history”, it’s not like I couldn’t trivially re-open them again as needed.

          • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s far easier to have your history cluttered than you might think, and then finding the sites that you need or might need becomes harder.

          • Vincent@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah but you might forget that you need those tabs. Maaaybe they weren’t that important then, but maybe they are.

            • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think that “weren’t that important” indeed hints at how I keep/toss stuff IRL, too.

              I toss a lot of shit. I don’t keep stuff around for that one hypothetical use case that might crop up in 5 years. Most stuff sells surprisingly well second-hand, and this frees up a lot of money I had otherwise lying around doing fuck all for me.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I don’t have enough time in the day or week or month or year to do everything I want to, so I keep my tabs open until I chip away at them one at a time. It takes a long time, but it doesn’t mean that the tabs aren’t useful to me and won’t remain useful months later.

        • wildcardology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s me with YouTube videos, sometimes I would see a video on recommended that interests me but don’t have time to watch it immediately, I have to open it on a new tab otherwise I would never find it again. Sometimes it takes me days to find the time to watch it.

          • Waffelson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            You can add interested videos to playlist “Watch later” and it will available on all devices with your account

        • Salix@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Why not just bookmark the tabs? Put them in a folder in your bookmark bar called “To Do” or something and they’d all be right there.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        A handy to when it comes to closing tabs: mouse wheel down anywhere on the tab label closed the tab, no need to find the little ‘x’.

        Related: mouse wheel down on a link opens that link in a new tab.

      • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I have one tab per email account. A few for github issues I’m waiting to be fixed. One which is some random search I just use as reminder. None of which I have closed in months. I literally have a script to boot them up on my second monitor everytime I boot my pc.

  • nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Firefox had tab grouping first. Before Chrome. And then it broke support for it when they did the add-ons overhaul. I’m surprised bringing it back wasn’t a high priority…

    • MrOtherGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      IIRC the old tab groups feature was eventually removed because telemetry showed that only very few people used it…

      • burrito@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s because us power users know to turn the telemetry off and also have it blocked on our network.

        • MrOtherGuy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          10 months ago

          Right, but then you shouldn’t be shocked to find out that a feature was removed because nobody seemed to be using it.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            10 months ago

            No, I expect Mozilla to know their market and use other means (like focus groups or surveys or something) to figure out which features are actually popular, instead of lazily using a bad metric.

            • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Mozilla knows their market. Because of said telemetry.

              How do you think that works? For any other app?

              Hint:

              (like focus groups or surveys or something)

              Not like this. Because they have both shown to be absolutely terrible for this general market preference research.

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Did you miss the part of the conversation where folks were pointing out that lots of users turn the telemetry off?

                Your reply is as tone-deaf and non-responsive as sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling “nuh uh!” like a toddler.

                If you want to be persuasive you’ve got to prove that the telemetry is somehow useful in spite of many users turning it off, and you’ve done absolutely fuck-all to argue that.

                • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  You are committing the same mistake as you accuse me of:

                  many users turning it off

                  [citation needed] [how many?]

                  For all you know, maybe the 15 very vocal users in here are the only ones who turn it off. Or do we know that many users do it? How many? 5%? 50%? 95%?

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Watching people use Chrome, fucking nobody uses it there either, except for work situations where on FF, you’re supposed to be using Multi-Account containers anyways.

      • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It didn’t help that they hid the button in the customize menu and made the feature not discoverable.

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    10 months ago

    I hope Firefox implements a great and robust tab grouping feature. Because they used to have one that worked beautifully.

    Firefox used to have Panorama view, which was a way to group tabs with a nice visual interface. …and they removed it because not enough people were using it.

    …Well if you stopped removing useful and perfectly functional features, maybe you wouldn’t need to rebuild them later when it turns out people do want that feature, huh, Mozilla?

    There’s an extension that reimplements Panorama and it kinda sorta works like it used to.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 months ago

    Thank Christ.

    Can they also be synced container tabs Mozilla? As in synced across devices. I know there’s a container tabs add on you can get, but it doesn’t sync from my laptop to my desktop to my phone. Would be awesome if they did so natively.

    While you’re at it, could you add tree style tabs natively in Firefox? Pretty please, with cream on top.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      10 months ago

      Grouping tabs just naturally fits so many computer workflows though. I’m often working on multiple things at a time and tab groups help me keep it all organized.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yeah of course, but that’s why all browsers - AFAIK - allow you to open new windows not just new tabs. This naturally groups tabs into contexts. In other words, this very feature is implemented already.

        • loudwhisper@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          But in a new window i don’t have the 10-20 pinned tabs that I jump to very often, having tab groups helps in this regard.

    • Howdy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have my Firefox browser set to clear history, cookie and site data on exit. I never use probably more than 15 at a time. More than 10 is very rare. I don’t get people that keep dozens of tabs open. I just you know browse back to what i was looking for. Seems much faster than searching through tons of tabs.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        Multiple projects that each spawn ten plus tabs. Why in the hell would i want to “remember” some obscure stack overflow link when i can use simple tab groups to keep it there?

        And bookmarking something so temporary is also wasteful. Tab groups are a lifesaver IMO.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I have my Firefox browser set to clear history, cookie and site data on exit.

        Might as well just have your whole PC set to reset to a naked installation on each reboot, tbh.

      • LucidNightmare@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Finally, someone who uses their browser like me! I keep my Firefox the same, and with containers, I still stay logged in, but don’t have to worry about cookies being left over.

        Like you, I’ve never understood how people can handle having 10+ tabs open at once. I have my YouTube tab always up and ready to go, and the rest of the time it is a tab to search, open the link in new tab, and so on and so on. It gives me anxiety looking at the mess that some people have on their browsers! It’s the equivalent of having your entire desktop filled with shortcuts and folders!

        Don’t get me wrong, I know more than my normal 5 tabs can be needed at times, I’ll put my own reasons below. But every single day? Closing the browser and having it load more than 5-10 tabs again every single time? No wonder people complain about Firefox being slow, their browsing habits cause it! 😂

        The most tabs I’ve ever had open was only to download multiple mods off of nexus that looked cool back before they made Collections a god send. Now I don’t have to do that any more. 😁

        • Howdy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Wow, thanks. Yeah, I was surprised to see the comments saying the way we browse is abnormal lol… Maybe it’s just how our brain works but I know for me, I am hyper focused on what I am doing in that moment and my thoughts are always shifting but keeping my browser only with what I am actively using is just something I’ve always done. For example, right now this is the only tab I have open. :). I need to utilize containers more… Really, what I want is something that would open containers automatically for specified sites and not have to choose manually to open in.

          Cheers and thanks for the comment.

          • LucidNightmare@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            You can set containers to open every time you go to the website!

            For example, I have a YouTube container, and every time I open YouTube, it opens in the container even if it was in a Nexus Mods container or anything like that. Once you have a website in view that you want to always open in a specific container, you can click at the very right side of the address/search bar, and it is an icon just like the containers icon. It says Always Open in or something like that. I hope that helps you streamline your containers! 😁

        • Dennis Croskey@mas.to
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          @LucidNightmare @mynamesnotrick When I read about different browsers and they spend half the article talking about tab groups and tab islands and tab this and tab that, my eyes glaze over. I do not understand how it’s that big a deal. Maybe I’m not a “power user.”

          • LucidNightmare@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I love having features, that’s fine with me, but when their biggest “draws” are the tabs thing, then I am with you. Like, okay? How is the extension support? What does their privacy features look like? What does it do that makes my browsing more pleasant? Oh, just tabs tabs and more tabs…? Next!

  • auth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    See for yourself, it has almost 3,000 votes now. 👇

    lol… some features requests on Android have many more votes and are being ignored by Google… like ad-hoc Wi-Fi

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        True, sadly I’m unable to stop using tree style tabs after getting accustomed to it years ago. It’s one of those rabbit holes I’m unable to climb out of, similar to modern keyboard layouts.

        • everett@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          Don’t be sad. I’d say you’re doing it right! Vertical space is much more limited than horizontal on 21st century monitors, and tabs are wide, not tall. Tree tab UI enables semantic layout (showing you practically unlimited levels of nesting), plus they always give you consistent room to read page titles. Why should the usability of tabs decrease as you open more of them?

    • figaro@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is absolutely not a replacement for the tab group experience Chrome and Edge offer

          • HubertManne@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I would say its superior. You can create and add tabs to groups. expand and collapse them. make rules for certain sites to auto open in a group you made. sort based on url or name or last used. rename them. move the groups around visually. I do use it with the vertical tab view and tend to ignore the top bar though so it may depend on your usage.

            • figaro@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It seems a bit too much like glorified bookmarks to me. I’m glad you find it useful though :)

              • HubertManne@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                I mean you can say that about any tab add on really. You could mostly get it from some sort of auto bookmarking add on that additionally updated it based on browsing within a domain maybe and auto discarding on close although it still would nto quite be there because it would discard to much if you kept several tabs for a domain. I mean it might be able to recognize multiple tabs and save the bookmarks alright but the auto reaping I bet would mess up.

      • hothomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Absolutely this, there isn’t anything currently from what I’ve found that gives the easy experience that Chrome/Edge has.

        Only thing that I’ve been missing when I moved from Edge, apart from PWA support.

        • figaro@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah honestly all the other solutions are just copium. Chrome tab groups are exactly what a tab group should be. It’s simple and useful. That’s all I need, all I want.

    • abaddon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m away from my PC so I can’t name it but there’s another plugin similar to Tree Style Tabs. The creator claims that TST takes up a lot of resources. I do notice Firefox taking a lot of CPU/mem but that’s probably my fault. I’ve tried both and either works well.

      • sajran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m well aware of what Vivaldi can do but I refuse to support Chromium’s monopoly. In fact, it’s the only reason why I use FF.

      • firewood010@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Firefox is open source and not chromium tho. Using Chromium still helps Google push their standard as the web standard. Firefox and Safari are the only two pillars standing up against Chromium we have now.

      • ULS@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Vivaldi is pretty cool… Although most features I don’t need. I have a hard time breaking up with Firefox.

        I was using Vivaldi as my living room TV PC browser because it was kind of a one stop shop.

        Eventually I found plugins and mods for Firefox that did only what I need.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Presumably every site that supports RSS? RSS is standardised.

    • ULS@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This was such an old feature/idea. Cool to see old idea getting new life.

  • emb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nice! This is the one thing in other browsers that I wish I had in Firefox.