• CoderKat@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jesus Christ… It’s even worse than the headline appears. They went extra far out of their way to keep him not only from acting as mayor, but also in the town’s fire department. They made blatantly racist comments. And they apparently had previously maintained an unelected white “dynasty” of sorts on the mayor position. Despite the town being 85% black, they’ve never had a black mayor (or an elected one, for that matter).

  • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jfc. White Alabama assholes proving yet again why the state can’t seem to dig itself out of the Jim Crow era.

    • CeruleanRuin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Reconstruction” was a well-chosen name, because it was always intended to reconstruct the white power structures in place before the war.

      The goal instead should have been deconstruction. Sherman should never have stopped.

  • BurnTheRight@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is inappropriate to associate with racists, misogynists, homophobes, xenophobes and bigots. Disown conservatives in your daily life.

  • SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Keeping in mind there’s 3 sides to every story, if this is remotely true (and I’m sure it’s more than remotely true) then that’s totally messed up.

    The idea that there wouldn’t even be elections for 70 years it’s hard to wrap my head around. On the other hand, this is a community of 300 people. When you’re dealing with such a small number of people, a lot of messed up stuff can happen.

    • Pegatron@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a majority black town that has maintained unelected white leadership since reconstruction. I think the motives are obvious here

      • SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably a number of different motives. Yes a degree of racism, but also a degree of nepotism and desperation. All those people are unemployed because there’s nothing to do except work in government in that town, so of course parents are going to try to get their kids into government positions using their current position of power. Then there’d obviously be a deep chasm of classism, since the government worker class would be on a completely different level than the unemployed class in many ways, and I’m sure they look down their nose at the ‘unwashed masses’ (who are overwhelmingly black since that’s where the south came from).

        Unethical? Super unethical. And immoral. And illegal. And virtually everyone in government should be fired and charged personally with 1983/1984 claims.

        But also a reminder that we need to remember there’s a lot of tragedies in our back yard and they won’t go away if we just ignore them.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How big do you think the government of a town of a couple hundred people is? It’s probably like half a dozen people. The mayor, the sheriff, the judge, the clerk, and the treasurer. There’s not much “government” to work in. I am familiar with towns like this.