• MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You haven’t provided any evidence that would disprove my reasoning, you are merely assuming that I would ignore it.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      We’re not required to provide evidence lol. You are the one making an assertion, burden of proof is on you.

      • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you’re asserting that it can’t POSSIBLY have been a DEI hire, I’d say that requires proof as well.

        All you’re saying is my evidence isn’t good enough to convict someone based on it, which I already know and have admitted. This isn’t a court of law, so speculation is certainly allowed. You don’t have to believe me, but you’re not going to change my mind either unless you can come up with a better theory.

        • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          You don’t have to believe me, but you’re not going to change my mind either unless you can come up with a better theory.

          You haven’t made a compelling argument for anyone to believe you or to rationally justify your own belief.

          unless you can come up with a better theory.

          There are literally thousands of articles being written about systemic problems at Boeing. Your “theory” consists of noticing this one person’s race and saying DEI. You’re literally the guy in the OP.

    • dezvous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Your argument is an appeal to ignorance. Aka, a logical fallacy, Aka a shit argument.

      • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        How so?

        I provided a reasonable, possible explanation with circumstantial evidence to support it. All you’ve done is call it racist, which is simply an appeal to emotion. If anything you’re appealing to ignorance by suggesting that this line of inquiry does not merit any further investigation because if proven true, it would offend a lot of people. You’re literally making the case that it’s better to be ignorant than racist.

        • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I provided a reasonable, possible explanation with circumstantial evidence to support it.

          You did no such thing.

          All you’ve done is call it racist, which is simply an appeal to emotion.

          Ironically, your entire premise provides more circumstantial evidence for you being racist than any particular problem at Boeing.

            • dezvous@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Nobody is disputing this you fucking idiot. We’re calling you a racist because you’re blaming it on minorities. Holy fuck, you seriously cannot be this dense. It is impossible for someone to be this fucking stupid. I refuse to believe you’re not a troll at this point. Blocked.