- cross-posted to:
- games@lemmit.online
- cross-posted to:
- games@lemmit.online
You must log in or # to comment.
Oh boy, another game where “historical accuracy” means “no people of color” and “you can pull yourself up into nobility by your own bootstraps”
All I know about this game is that the director was a gamergater and that the enemy horde you face is the Cumans. Which is racist precisely because the Cumans are turkic.
Legit, give me a game where you die at 12 because your dad let a rat drown in the family beer supply and gave everyone the plague
the game unironically would be dopeOregon Trail, but 800 CE Europe
The kind of game where you can die because you were caught washing your dick and subsequently got burned as a witch
no , historical accuracy means that they rebuild the areas historical accurate ? Its the only game to ever done that , take a area annd rebuild it very acuratly.
For some people that are interested in History is this is a very big deal , like it is for Dull people that they killed the Fantasy Enemy to save the Fantasy Land , with the Comrads that have personal issues with the Gods and deamons of the Fantasy world , that you fixed beforehand …
thats it not all wild Fantasy , is the deal for some
no , historical accuracy means that they rebuild the areas historical accurate ? Its the only game to ever done that , take a area annd rebuild it very acuratly.
Assassin’s Creed rebuilds historic places, but it’s still a fantasy game. Honestly, the only history people that seem excited about this game are the chuds who only think history is learning about battles and weapons.
Do these games even have citations like Pentiment (a fun adventure game in a historic setting)? If something wants to be historically accurate in any way, it should have cited research.
you could be angry & Anti on more valid target… its pretty childicsch and escapism to put this gravity of emotions into Playtools…
You’re the one defending the game by this guy, but suit yourself
Treat defense force
Can you explaine this
“historical accuracy” means “no people of color”
Accusation in detail ?
-
Are you accusing 12 th Bohemia of not having Particpated in the Slave trade ?
-
or do you postulate that only , “Past Slave importing Nations” are not Racist , because they have the adequate ratio of people of color ?
-
Are games generally Forbidden that play before the 16th century ?
-
Are you American by any chance ?
-
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
“you can pull yourself up into nobility by your own bootstraps”
That’s not what happens in this game at all. You’re a noble bastard raised by peasants (which explains why you feel like a nobody starting out and have no skills that nobles are raised with) but your noble father still looks out for you and pulls strings to get you the freedom with which you gain skills and become an adventurer or whatever. There’s no bootstraps involved, just explicit noble privilege.
The first one was one of the most boring games I ever pirated. Whose fantasy is “I want to be a kinda slightly above average dude in feudalism”.
me ? Found it better then the 500ths time of "get the artifact to kill the Morgoth thing " …
they actually rebuild a hole medival landscape acuratly of this now dying Bohemian Hinterland. thers no other Medium in which you have a hole region build back pretty accuartly to Medival look…
I found it very, very satisfying to slowly, steadily work my way up to being an above average swordsman after starting out as a clumsy wimp who has to run away from the average bandit because bandits know how to do combat and he doesn’t. Far more satisfying than “press x to explode 100 goons”
Kingdom Yawn 🥱
geolocated one castle from the trailer … i think
More like Kingdom Chud.
I bought the first game on sale and at no point during the three hour tutorial section did I come across any interesting gameplay or story but then it was too late to get a refund
fuckin same
what if skyrim but somehow worse
An achievement in the medium.
I fukken loved the first game, although on a replay once I got to the combat tutorial I noped out. Hopefully they’ve taken some notes from some of the other “realistic sword combat” games that have come out that the swordplay doesn’t have to be so stiff.
Yeah i didn’t really the combat. I was on consile though and i think that’s a big part of my problem with it, it just never felt right. I’ve got mixed feeling about the game overall, but the general concept was great and they did an amazing job with the setting.
First game was ok, the pacing wasn’t my cup of tea but I did actually like the world. I’ve been to a lot of castles and real medieval villages so the detail they put into accuracy stood out. It’s a shame the director is a chud, but what they made never really seemed affected by that.
The soundtrack seems a lot better.
It was interesting playing that game. There were some things i really liked. I think my biggest issue with it was that it felt like such a slog to get any skill to some kind of level of basic competency. Setting was great though. I’d love to see more games with non fantasy settings like that, but with a little more respect for proples time.
watched jerma play the first one and it looked like dogshit is all I’ll say
I’ve kinda flip flopped all over regarding the first game, in some regards it’s pretty interesting with the lengths they went to recreate accurate medieval architecture (actual churches with mosaics and frescoes as well as peasant homes not being shit hovels). On the other side it did have a lot of features that were frustrating and could have likely been done smoother (still love that you start out illiterate and require around a week of in game time to learn to read). The story itself is neither bad nor good and honestly the side quests were far more interesting (going on a drunken bender with a village priest was a highlight quest).
I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
