Sorry for the paywall (but kinda not sorry since the LA Times is worth subscribing to)…
With little debate two years ago, state lawmakers passed a complex energy bill that enabled a sweeping change in how most Californians are billed for electricity.
The legislation was what Pacific Gas & Electric had asked for from the state public utilities commission three months before: a transformation of electric rates so that households would pay a fixed charge each month in exchange for lower rates for each kilowatt hour they used.
Gov. Gavin Newsom submitted the bill as part of a massive 2022 budget revision. In four days, it was passed out of an Assembly committee hearing without discussion, approved by the full Assembly and Senate and signed by Newsom.
…But opponents say the legislation was a financial gift to PG&E, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric, and will cause millions of Californians who live in small homes or apartments that use little electricity to pay more, while residents in large homes that use a lot of electricity will save money.
“If you wanted to design a policy that would send the signal that conservation doesn’t count, this would be it,” said Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group.”
In January, Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin, Democrat from Thousand Oaks, proposed a bill named AB 1999 to reverse much of what Newsom’s bill had done.
The opposition was angered even more when Speaker Robert Rivas (D-Hollister) and other Assembly leaders stopped debate on Irwin’s bill late last month with a procedural move that shelved it for the legislative session.
California somehow never fails to do the wrong thing when it comes to utilities.
The problem isn’t people with a few solar panels on their houses, the problem is climate change and poorly maintained infrastructure leading to wildfires and massive liabilities. Perhaps if these liabilities would come out of PG&Es absurdly high profits they’ll be motivated to rethink how maintenance and wildfire risk is mitigated.
City of Fresno was seriously thinking of changing out the power to local government over the cost.
People in Fresno are definitely gettung more vocal about the rising utility bills. I hope change comes sooner than later.
At first glance this also screws over people with solar panels. More “non-bypassable charges” that hit you regardless of how much power you use. Now each kWH generated will pay for an even smaller portion of your monthly bill.
These power companies have been on a constant mission to screw solar panel owners. It’s almost reaching “movie studio math” levels of complexity and smokescreens trying to cheat people.
Regardless of how much power you consume or generate, you are still making use of the distribution infrastructure, and that infrastructure needs to be maintained. It is completely reasonable to collect fees for that.
I get that, but every single change that comes down from the power companies is aimed at reducing the benefits from solar panels. From the time of use billing, now to this.
deleted by creator
We should do an initiative. No. Seriously. We should do a people led initiative to lessen the stranglehold pge and sce and etc. have on us.
They’re one of the main barriers to climate progress and a big reason people don’t want to further electrify.
All we need is organizing and to find in the text the right lever to pull to make it clear it’s a decision of ratepayers vs. corporate profits.
If we can strangle profitability, takeover attempts like SF and Fresno have a much better chance of succeeding
Edit: imagine down voting a pay wall bypass 🤡
