Looks like they could totally fit a bike rack on these things too!

  • hallettj@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    By using one rail they can get two-way traffic on one set of tracks. These early units have an anti-tipping safety device that extends to the second rail, but they plan to get rid of that later.

    • Ghostie21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sadly, monorails require different rails which are taller and thicker this would still apply to a smaller pod style device. I do not see how they could ever keep this balanced on these rails, and don’t think the rails would hold up anyways. Additionally, the loop sidedness of the weight distribution seems to me like it can create major issues when the rails have been designed under the idea that it would be more or less equal on both.

      This seems like just another person trying to reinvent the wheel because us Americans hate rail, even though the us was built on rail.

      • BoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Suspended monorails don’t take taller rails. You can keep the train upright. It has been well demonstrated. The amount of weight on the rails is insignificant compared to what they were designed for. I doubt there would be any detectable movement.

        All that said this seems like an overly complicated solution.