Not all humans inherently deserve rights just because they are human. Think of people like Hiter, Jeffrey Dahmer, and the dozens of other evil people. No one would reasonably think they deserve sympathy, because of what they chose to do.

If your evil enough to commit such a heinous act as child rape, I don’t see any legitimate reason why that person should deserve any sort of sympathy.

Subconsciously everyone agrees on this to some extent. Look at prisons, (depending on the crime) they remove your right to vote, own a gun, even walk outside, and have certain jobs.

The reason I believed my take is controversial is because of how I think those pedos would lose their rights. I believe people as evil as them aren’t people at all. They are simply containers of flesh with a human face, and should be seen as such. I have no issue with the idea they should be used as slaves and test subjects. Arguably this would actually benefit humanity (especially in terms of medicine) because now instead of risking the lives of innocent people like doctors or everyday Joe’s, we could use them to see if the experimental drug has any side effects. Honestly, what are they going to do? Revoke consent? I wonder of the child they raped got that same privilege…

I’m sure this goes without saying but the person would have to be caught red-handed with undeniable proof to be subjected to this

  • BezzelBob@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Forgot to respond to this

    but you have an incredibly US-centric view, and not even half the US citizens would agree with you.

    Which is also wrong.

    In 2016 Indonesia passed a law authorising chemical castration

    The Czech Republic still uses surgical castration regularly

    Russia, Poland, and South Korea still use chemical castration as a preventative measure.

    So no. This isn’t “American centric”. You people are just defending child rapists.