• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It ends up being more complicated. You get enough infusions as AB+ and you’ll start picking up strange antibodies that increase your chance for that sense of impending doom

    Similarly you could likely receive O+ blood if you were O- without adverse effects, but only once.

    • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah we don’t really mix blood types at all here in Lebanon, and I really doubt they do anywhere else. Universal donor and universal recipient is just theory, in practice it’s easier to receive O- than AB+ because AB is really uncommon (as is the case everywhere).

      AFAIK the A/B and Rhesus antigens are not the only markers and there are more blood compatibility components that are taken into account if possible.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I have a relative who has an unfortunate condition that causes internal bleeding. They’ve had enough blood transfusions that their antibodies are completely haywire.

      Multiple times, doctors have not listened to their protests, and given them O-. They turn an impressive shade of yellow (among other, more serious, issues).

      Last I heard, there were 2 compatible donors known, 1 in a different country. Thankfully, you can store blood longer term. It’s just not cost efficient to do in bulk. They have their own little stockpile of blood at their local hospital (mostly self donated).

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Years ago I read somewhere that they discovered a way to remove something from the blood and make it universal, like eliminate blood type all together.

    Wonder how that research going?

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s expensive and blood can only be stored for so long. Easiest to stick with compatible blood types.

      There are also loads of other antigens in blood that can cause a reaction. These are just the commonly known ones. So blood should still be cross matched anyway if it isn’t an emergency.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        And, quite frankly, we actually are getting somewhat close to producible artificial blood, so there’s just not a whole lot of need for the investment.

        And those artificial blood studies have DARPA money behind them.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Only [YOUR BLOOD TYPE HERE] homies can interact with this comment.

  • Dbumba [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    AB+ Gang rise up. Universal recipients (sigma parasite) and universal plasma donors. When receiving blood sometimes I’ll mix A, B, and O just to flex.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      O+ here, the blood centre wants my plasma more often than my blood, but around peak road accident times they want my blood

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        If they’re not paying you for plasma as an O+ don’t do it, unless you specifically have some unusual subtyping thing.

        Apheresis plasma as anything but A or AB is just not something blood banks really need that much for transfusions, and industrial use can damn well pay for you for the privelege.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          They aren’t allowed to pay donors in Australia. There are worries that payment would attract people who shouldn’t donate and incentivise them to lie on the qualification form

              • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I am very familiar with the industry. I am telling you that you are being taken advantage of to benefit a for-profit company that your presumably non-profit blood banks sell your donations to.

                It’s one thing when that’s to defray their quite high cost of operating, and they’re selling plasma that would otherwise be wasted.

                It’s another thing when they have you coming in just to con you out of plasma.