cross-posted from: https://dubvee.org/post/1735883

The Department of Justice has amended its antitrust lawsuit against Ticketmaster and Live Nation, alleging that Ticketmaster’s introduction of nontransferable tickets and the SafeTix system was primarily intended to stifle competition from rival platforms like StubHub and SeatGeek, rather than merely to reduce ticket fraud. “The complaint, which was amended on Monday after 10 states joined the DOJ’s lawsuit, cites internal Ticketmaster documents obtained during the legal process,” notes The Verge. From the report:

In 2019, Ticketmaster rolled out SafeTix, which replaced static barcodes on electronic tickets with encrypted barcodes that refresh every 15 seconds. Ticketmaster marketed SafeTix as a way of reducing ticket fraud, but the complaint claims reducing competition was âoea primary motivationâ for the new ticketing system. […] The amended complaint includes new information about Ticketmaster’s dominance of the events market. One internal Live Nation document cited in the complaint notes that Ticketmaster is the primary ticketer for approximately 80 percent of arenas across the country that host NBA or NHL teams. As of 2022, Live Nation-promoted events accounted for 70 percent of all amphitheater shows across the country, according to internal Live Nation events mentioned in the complaint.

The DOJ alleges that because of Ticketmaster’s conduct, consumers have âoepaid more and continue to pay more for fees relating to tickets to live events than they would have paid in a free and open competitive market.â The exact amount of monetary harm is still unknown, the complaint claims, and will require discovery from Ticketmaster and Live Nation’s books, as well as from its third-party competitors.

  • jumjummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Exactly. Tickets should always be non-transferable with some minor exceptions. Fuck Ticketmaster, it fuck scalpers even more. They add nothing to the ticket buying process other than increasing costs.

    Almost like car salesmen.

    • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Because some corporation is abusing scalping you propose we can no longer sell what we own.

      I suggest we kill the corporation and keep our rights.

      • curse_of_yig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, 100%

        Ticket master isn’t responsible for tickets selling out immidiately and prices going up 100-1000% on stubhub. Scalpers are responsible for that. The only way to eradicate that market is to force tickets to be non transferable. And it’s not even a novel concept. There’s plenty of things you cant resell.

        • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Corporate scalpers. A corporation holding venues hostage for ticket sales. These aren’t humans. Limit the rights of the corporations fucking over humans instead of the humans. It’s not a novel concept, over 150 years since it was explained at length.