This is what I am hearing endlessly about why Baldur’s Gate 3 is a success. I say that’s a crock of shit sold by bad companies and developers and an insult to Larians hard work.
These are the things for my opinion:
- They have 20 years of experience making CRPGS with the Divinity series
- They do Early Access to test and perfect their systems
- The listen to customer feedback and distill the good from the bad, ending up with a better product
- They don’t insult their customers and respect them
- No microtransactions or Day 1 DLC, or mention of upcoming DLC and Season Pass
- They hire Writers, Composers and Developers BASED ON MERIT!
- You can see the love they put in the games from the Panels from Hell and social media
I am sure there are many more things that add to their success but random chance and luck is not the reason; hard work, dedication and good management is!
Just a little rant and pet peave I wanted to get off my chest.
You’re right.
This reminds me of when people say “you’re so talented at X”
Like no. It was a shit ton of practice and hardwork that developed that skill.
Unrelated to gaming but I have similar thing people tell me in regards to my work. I had a very decent job and now own a company or two doing software development and the most common thing people tell me is I was lucky to find a good job that started it all. No motherfucker I worked my ass off, didn’t have a GF until age of 20 and spent countless nights working while others were out getting shitfaced.
Yeh, the problem with your logic is your not considering the set of people who work harder than you, are smarter than you and yet don’t own multiple companies. Unless what you’re really trying to say is that they don’t exist… in which case I’d like to challenge that assertion.
I think what is commonly missed is that an outcome being lucky and an outcome being due to focus, dedication and hard work are not mutually exclusive.
I am aware of awesome games/devs that never succeeded. Larian is lucky, but Larian is also well deserving of the success they built themselves with decades of dedication to great game design.
Yes, how goes that saying? The harder I work, the luckier I get.
Yeah, it negates the effort the person put it. This is the reason people tend to dislike the Mary-Sue characters of “modern movies”.
I think we know what OP thinks about Affirmative Action being overturned by the Supreme Court.
yep - came here to see Larian praise, stepped in the usual conservative dog shit
oh well
Are you saying that Larian doesn’t let their diversity and inclusion department run their actual business?
What a concept!
PS. For those downvoting the previous comment… Obvious sarcasm is obvious.
Except that that is not obvious sarcasm but the normalisation of anti diversity talk.
The more important talking point would be, that Larian does not put short term business measures clad in „pseudo science“ before their product related decisions. Otherwise we would have no mod support, the wizard class would be the first dlc and the complete set of speech would only be available for people with a season pass.
Not to mention, why is the assumption that a diverse team doesn’t have merit?
If you’re not careful, not caring about diversity might unintentionally put people with merit out of the team, because they might feel unwelcome and as outsiders, making them leave or not join the company. It’s a problem many, including me, have faced.
In addition, there is an inherent benefit in having a more diverse team, especially on creative pursuits. You have more lived experiences to draw ideas, and stories, from.
Yeah this isn’t about who is working there, it’s about the priorities of the decision makers and folks in charge imo. Great reply tho, ty.
Are you referring to Deadlic, who mostly relied on new people and interns, with the second to last point?
No just the industry at large with their “Quota” hiring policies and other such crap.
EDIT: For those doing the downvoting… you don’t improve your civilization by bringing it down to the lowest level, you try raise the lower level up. “Quotas” bring things down being you cannot use the best people. “Quotas” are the easy path for virtue signaling and you end up worse for it. Proper education and training is the only way to improve things, but that takes time and money.
This viewpoint is so disconnected from the actual reality that it’s disingenuous at best. I have worked in the games industry for nearly 20 years working with AAA and small teams. I have never felt like I’ve hired someone, or have had someone on my team who didn’t earn their position through talent and passion. You’re making up some political reality that does not exist, and being angry at something that is not happening just to weave some weird narrative that I feel is about 5 seconds from you simply saying “go woke, go broke”.
It is important that you realize that diverse viewpoints makes games better, and that has to come into consideration for teams as well! More diverse viewpoints on your team will make a better RPG! Yes, you obviously need passionate and talented people, that goes without saying. But to make the best games, you need a diverse team.
I said nothing about diverse viewports. That is your own skewed perceptions jumping in. I am all for diversity and equality. Everybody should be treated equally!
What I am against is FORCED hiring practices. I know nothing about the hiring practices of Larian, and you can see they have a very diverse team, but you can also see, from their various podcasts, that the people there are capable and love doing what they are doing. There is no “in your face” agenda pushing from their material.
Why are you so afraid of hiring by merit? But, just continue to push your own narrative in your head if it makes you feel better.
Huh? I literally said in my post that I’ve never run into an instance of someone not being hired by their merit. I don’t understand how anyone could not hire someone if they didn’t have talent and passion, so we are in agreement there, unless you have a different definition of merit.
What does happen at any company that measures diversity in their talent pool, Larian included, is they will look at the diversity make-up of their teams and make an effort to find more diverse candidates for full-time roles and ensure there is multiple types of candidates in an interview cycle for a role. All this does is ensure as a hiring manager, you are able to evaluate a greater variety of people, and find that best and most talented candidate. Again, you’re describing situations where people are “forced” to make some kind of decision, and making it sound like it’s some bad decision like they had to leave a “better” candidate on the table, when I have never seen this happen. You want to know what companies hate to do? Firing people because they can’t do the job. It wastes everyone time, costs us money, lowers team morale, potentially impacts timelines and the quality of the project. I can promise you no company would ever choose some diversity candidate who is bad at their job, just to make some number go up. If that were the case, the diversity numbers though out the industry would be in a MUCH better place than they are now.
I don’t know what you’re thinking about with the “in your face” agenda point. Do you have an example that comes to mind of other studios? BG3 covers topics of sexuality, race, and gender in the storylines and character interactions from what I’ve played, so it’s not like they ignore these topics which are often debated IRL politically. It’s handled with tactfulness in a fantasy setting, and the player is given agency throughout, so they may not lead down certain side-stories, but it’s certainly covered in the game.
I’m also confused what he means, I’ve only played about eight hours but everything I’ve seen makes me think it’s a very progressive and diversity friendly game.
Really feels like this guy is trying to create a narrative out of nothing to justify his small minded nonsence
Huh? I literally said in my post that I’ve never run into an instance of someone not being hired by their merit. I don’t understand how anyone could not hire someone if they didn’t have talent and passion, so we are in agreement there, unless you have a different definition of merit.
This is lucky for you, I have not been so lucky and had to be forced to train people that did not have the ability to do the job but were hired solely based on other factors even though their were better candidates. But of course YOUR experience invalidates everything else.
Did I even mention all the stuff in the game? If fact It even said it was GOOD WRITING by QUALIFIED people. No I did not… again projection on your part trying to force a narrative that is not there.
My point always has been and will be… Hire on merit and not to fit quotas. This is not political or any such thing, it again is YOUR projection for YOUR narrative.
This is lucky for you, I have not been so lucky and had to be forced to train people that did not have the ability to do the job but were hired solely based on other factors even though their were better candidates.
The thumb-twiddling industry is on a hiring spree?
This is lucky for you, I have not been so lucky and had to be forced to train people that did not have the ability to do the job but were hired solely based on other factors even though their were better candidates. But of course YOUR experience invalidates everything else.
Just because that was YOUR experience doesn’t mean it invalidates what, based on consensus, is coming practice which is merit based hires. Sorry you had that problem, but that alone does not make it an industry wide problem.
- there is no evidence to suggest that Larian doesn’t value diversity in their hiring process, so your point is moot
- quotas demonstrably work. https://www.forbes.com/sites/lizelting/2022/09/22/stop-saying-quotas-dont-work-because-they-demonstrably-do/?sh=24a840845b9c
- you seem to want to bring conservative political talking points to a baldurs gate forum. Why? Please stop.
you seem to want to bring conservative political talking points to a baldurs gate forum. Why? Please stop.
Firstly, you know nothing about my political leanings. If I had to myself in one of your “boxes” it would definitely be left leaning not conservative, so that makes your point moot.
Weather you like it or not, conservatives are the loudest voice against “quota” or “diversity” focused hiring.
Maybe you need to reflect on that
I don’t have to know anything about your political leanings to remark that you’re bringing up a conservative talking point. Being left-leaning doesn’t mean you automatically can’t make conservative arguments?
What a weird conclusion to draw, when you have so many reasons to attribute their success to already. What exactly do you know about their hiring processes? Do you have any sources?
deleted by creator
Speaking nothing but truths
