• solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    doesn’t most of amazon’s revenue come from AWS? why do they even keep trying with these stupid home surveillance/advertisement gadgets that no one asked for?

    • manualoverride@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Owning that space in peoples homes is the point, I bought them just for controlling my lights via voice, but the screen started as a clock and weather report and now shows adverts almost constantly.

      I’m looking at HomeAssistant as a replacement but you have to realise that unless you are tech savvy, you probably don’t even know HomeAssistant exists let alone know how to set it up for your requirements.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, it just requires people to run normal fucking updates like literally EVERY piece of software does, even the canned bullshit from corpos.

          • manualoverride@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Having to do any manual step is beyond what the Echo devices require, they just reboot themselves randomly one day and boom, a whole new new set of features for advertisers.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ohh, fully auto updates turned on by default on a shitty IoT device? A hacker’s wet dream.

              • manualoverride@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Not sure who you think you are advising here, but I suspect Amazon is making sure their echo devices are on the high end of security, any vulnerability will get a lot of press attention.

                For Home Assistant and other more open devices this is the problem, you either accept a lot of tinkering ensuring it’s updated, working and secure, or it fails the wife/parent test.

                Apple, Google or Amazon devices are just too easy in comparison, but you have to put up with the intrusion and ads.

                A lot more people are willing to sacrifice data and adverts for convenience.

      • idunnololz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Even with home assistant set up, I still have Google assistant handling the voice control aspect. I might be wrong but I don’t think home assistant comes with any voice controls. You still need something else if you want to control it with voice.

        Edit: it looks like there is something built into HA called Assist. I tried it a bit and while the basics work, I find it harder to use than google assistant.

        • person420@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Getting Home Assistant to play nicely with Google without using their Nabu Casa service definitely is a hurdle, but once you get over it, it’s super nice. I ended up just blocking Google DNS inside my network to force all the Google home devices to use my internal DNS to fix the https/hairpin NAT issue. It wasn’t a big deal since my kids are getting older and I needed to block outbound DNS in general since they’re getting savvy enough to get around my content filtering.

          • idunnololz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Oh I just paid for Nabu Casa. It’s only $65 USD / yr and it supports the dev of HA. I’m happy to pay for it for how much I get out of HA.