• impartial_fanboy [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    China did not industrialize on the basis of a colonial empire

    It didn’t industrialize directly from a colonial empire, yes. However the capital that flowed into it certainly was, if China had not opened itself up to foreign capital it would not have industrialized anywhere near as fast as it did.

    since the south will eventually get richer despite colonialism

    Until they saturate their markets and start to look outside their borders for new markets.

    while the north will struggle because it doesn’t know how to develop without colonialism

    Colonialism is a product of capitalism, if you got rid of the entire global north but let the global south continue capital accumulation they would recreate colonialism, by necessity. No one knows how to develop without colonialism because no one knows how to develop without capitalism.

    • lil_tank [any, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      However the capital that flowed into it certainly was, if China had not opened itself up to foreign capital it would not have industrialized anywhere near as fast as it did.

      They found a strategy to avoid being cold-wared by the global north, that’s not something a global north country does by definition

      Until they saturate their markets and start to look outside their borders for new markets.

      It’s not just capitalism in a vacuum, it’s a set of specific things that systematically happened in capitalist global north nations because they were dictatorships of the bourgeoisie. The phenomenon includes monopolies, banks and financial markets, three things that China is actively keeping under control.