GEICO, the second-largest vehicle insurance underwriter in the US, has decided it will no longer cover Tesla Cybertrucks. The company is terminating current Cybertruck policies and says the truck “doesn’t meet our underwriting guidelines.”

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 months ago

    Class action lawsuits are gonna be a mother fucker

    Part of the purchase agreement of a Tesla agreeing to binding arbitration. This means no class action suit. You can opt out of this within the first 30 days, but you have to send a letter requesting it.

    How many Tesla owners do you think do that?

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      2 months ago

      That assumes the court finds that enforceable. Usually they do, but a few times recently, they’ve said it’s not.

      • gramie@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s one of the nice things about the law in Quebec. Binding arbitration clauses are illegal.

          • gramie@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            *Je does

            “doivent” is third-person plural (they, not I)

            Oh, and I didn’t notice that autocorrect changed my French to English. Should be"dois" or, as you say, “devrais” for the conditional.

      • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean in trumps court of law musk can’t lose.

        If dumpy wins, for sure no class action.

        If dumpy loses, his Supreme Court will still side with the conservative side anyway, so probably still no class action.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Steam recently removed their arbitration clause, largely because paying for a thousand arbitration cases is worse than dealing with a class action.

      • locuester@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve heard that death by 1,000 arbitrations is a good way to make em regret it. Glad to see it’s true.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Which is what Musk is looking at happening.

        Between cybertruck and twitter, dude’s gonna bankrupt himself.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wow, I never thought I’d find an actual good argument for keeping independent car dealers as middlemen instead of allowing first-party sales, but here we are.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Can you connect the dots for me? Third party dealers always have idemnity? clauses anyways.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Presumably anything you’d agree to while buying from an independent dealer would be between you and the dealer, not you and the manufacturer, right? I don’t understand how the manufacturer would be a party to the transaction.

          (It might be that I’m naive about how modern car sales work.)

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m pretty clueless too, but to me your assertion doesn’t hold up to the concept of recalls.

            The true answer is probably that we’re both wrong and the answer is that as a consumer: you lose, fuck you. Also fuck your family dog.