• Mardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not talking about the material support which was good and cool and I am in fact more sympathetic to Stalin in this.

    But I think he does open himself to critique on his support of the USPC’s position of compromise with bourgeois Republican forces and their political position of not establishing a DOtP and, more damningly, rolling back the collectivisation established by the CCMA before it’s dissolution.

    It is my opinion that this lack of left unity fatally weakened Republican forces on a key front and moreover robbed us of a Western European Socialist experiment.

    There were good reasons for these actions, but in hindsight, I feel left unity would have been more productive.

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Pre-postscript message: Could you tell me what acronym USPC and CCMA stand for?


      I disagree and stand with the decision made by the Comintern in pursuing the popular front strategy.

      In the face of the contrarian trotskyite opposition and uncompromising anarchist uncooperativity, chosing to then immediately alienate the socialist, social democrat, and fellow traveler republican forces in an attempt to appease the vanity of the left opposition would’ve spelt a more immediate death to the Second Republic.

      Trying to push the communism button when you’re in a state of conflict and/ or instability is a form of dogmatism that puts the ideal ahead of the material. This was one of the bloody lessons that were learned during the Russian civil war.