The only numbers I will ever spell are one and zero, and only when using them as a pronoun, or for emphasis, respectively.

Is there ever a reason to not to use symbols when dealing with numbers? Why would “fourteen whatevers” ever be preferable to “14 whatevers”. It’s just so much easier to read numbers as symbols, not spelled out.

(Caveat, not including multipliers, like “273 billion”).

  • Laser@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    (Caveat, not including multipliers, like “273 billion”).

    Billion is ambiguous, better use powers of 10, e.g. 273e9 or 273e12, depending on which one you mean

    Or use SI units.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Even better haha, this is also my preference, but I think most audiences wouldn’t like that, I assume.

      Edit: 239,000,000,000 is obviously an option. But I rarely see that in a newspaper.

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    The real style guide is always your reader. If specific numbers may be searched for or copied, it is kinder to use symbols. If your reader is merely reading a number in conversation, it would usually be better to follow the usual style guide.

    The more you know and care for your reader, the better your writing will be.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I love the fact this proves the point, that even for emphasis (which I think the title of 1984 is fine to use), it’s LESS clear to spell it out.

      I am very thankful my company lets me write numbers and not spell it out.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Remove ambiguity at all costs!

    But if they insist I write things out:

    Ten-one Ten-two Ten-three Ten-four

    I don’t think it is clear as 11, 12, 13, 14 but hey who am I to argue?

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Just a small note on this, style guides have all sorts of weird rules about spelling out numbers, most of which I personally think are nonsense, hence making a meme. Not necessarily just less than 10

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re in an engineering community, is ten-one actually wrong?

        Consider the sequence: One, eleven, twenty-one, thirty-one, fourty-one, fifty-one… One hundred and one.

        As far as the convention of writing numbers out in words when they’re less than 10, there’s also conventions for less than 15, wikimedia uses the convention if it can be written in two words it’s optional to write it out as words.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah not sure what happened to it :/ I uploaded it to Lemmy.world

      Here it is again, just for you ;)

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well this is ironic. Something with Voyager, perhaps? I dunno.

        It’s the bugs bunny no meme, for style guides asking you to spell out numbers under 10.