• NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not saying whether the conclusion is right or wrong here, but this isn’t a “study” in the sense of something published in a rigorously peer-reviewed research journal. It’s a random car-ranking company scraping data from the Federal Highway Administration and posting it on their own website. The source is pretty low quality.

    Again, just because it’s low quality, doesn’t mean it’s wrong, but I’m not regarding this as very authoritative evidence.

  • xploit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, they had good safety rating IIRC - but no amount of safety measures is going to stop idiots from doing idiotic things with an explosive on wheels.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      They might have a good collision rating, but their decision to use electric door handles, (and hiding the manual ones) has killed a bunch of people.

      • xploit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Oh yeah I have no doubt that it’s poorly designed andfrom what I read/saw even shit build quality. You couldnt pay me to drive a tesla. Just kind of amusing when they were flaunting their safety back in the day

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, but they’re probably negating that by autopilot crashing cars straight into medians.