My Corp hired third party investigators. They’ll give you the dirt and suggestions but will not publicly release any of the findings. That’s up to the company that hired them to do and often they bury it or hand wave it away saying the investigation is complete and we have somethings to internalize npah blah blah.
LMG isn’t like a lot of other companies, they’re more open
Also, hopefully at least some of the leadership would realize the best way to get out of this is by being open about the problems and how you are working on fixing them
Edit: Of course I’m getting downvoted even though I was right and the CEO said they would publish the findings
The post literally says they are committed to publishing. I understand everyone’s skepticism of it but at least allow the transgression to happen first.
If you listen to the internal discussion meeting, from when that ex-employee left, they indicate that they have disclosure requirements, or more correctly privacy requirements that prevent them from talking about these issues externally. So even a very thorough investigative report will put them in a position where they can’t publish it unredacted, and the redacted version won’t satisfy the public. It’s a catch-22 situation for them. But I’m glad they’re at least going as far down the path as they can. It’ll be impossible to satisfy everyone, and clear the name entirely, or disprove things even. But they’re doing what they can
My Corp hired third party investigators. They’ll give you the dirt and suggestions but will not publicly release any of the findings. That’s up to the company that hired them to do and often they bury it or hand wave it away saying the investigation is complete and we have somethings to internalize npah blah blah.
LMG isn’t like a lot of other companies, they’re more open
Also, hopefully at least some of the leadership would realize the best way to get out of this is by being open about the problems and how you are working on fixing them
Edit: Of course I’m getting downvoted even though I was right and the CEO said they would publish the findings
Bad moment to say anything positive about LTT, even if it’s true😂
I know… I’m really trying to just be objective, but everyone’s already made up their mind without waiting on the third party investigation or anything
However, if the allegations are true though then it isn’t true and I was wrong
The post literally says they are committed to publishing. I understand everyone’s skepticism of it but at least allow the transgression to happen first.
If you listen to the internal discussion meeting, from when that ex-employee left, they indicate that they have disclosure requirements, or more correctly privacy requirements that prevent them from talking about these issues externally. So even a very thorough investigative report will put them in a position where they can’t publish it unredacted, and the redacted version won’t satisfy the public. It’s a catch-22 situation for them. But I’m glad they’re at least going as far down the path as they can. It’ll be impossible to satisfy everyone, and clear the name entirely, or disprove things even. But they’re doing what they can