Mozilla is Introducing 'Terms of Use' to Firefox
www.omgubuntu.co.uk
Hot off the back of its recent leadership rejig, Mozilla has announced users of Firefox will soon be subject to a 'Terms of Use' policy — a first for the

From the new terms:

When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    9·
    18 hours ago

    It is better than using Chromium, largely because of engine diversity. Mozilla still has a massive say in web standards, and for that I’ll continue using them until a better alternative comes out.

    Epiphany kinda sucks, and Ladybird isn’t a thing yet. So I’ll stick with Firefox and its forks until a legitimate challenger appears.

    • pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      2·
      17 hours ago

      I am still not convinced

      Mozilla still has a massive say in web standards

      I don’t know if we can say this with less than 3% of market share.

      until a better alternative comes out.

      I like Cromite a lot. Yeah, Brave has a lot of scandals, most of them because trying to make money however they can

      largely because of engine diversity.

      As an end user, I choose a browser looking for features I need.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        2·
        17 hours ago

        Cromite

        That’s still Chromium though.

        As an end user, I choose a browser looking for features I need.

        Same, though engine diversity is also a huge factor. I actually used Opera until they abandoned their rendering engine, and then went back to Firefox.

        When Firefox doesn’t cut it, I use Brave with the crypto BS disabled. It has a great ad blocker and is just as good as other Chrome browsers at compatibility.