It’s confusing for new users, and this instance in particular has 7k users but no interactions. It’s a bot army, with the top user being called @admin.
Extremely shady and misleading.
FYI, I’m not going to remove this post or anything (and I agree as well), but it’s not likely to be seen by the right people here. /c/Sysadmin is just our community for discussing sysadmin things and I don’t know how much /u/Ruud or any Lemmy devs hang out here.
You might try cross-posting it to these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.worldOf note, lemmy.ml is the server that is operated by the primary Lemmy devs.
Oh wow, I didn’t realize, sorry! Thought I was in the right place. I could still remove it if you think it’s for the best?
!lemmy_admin@lemmy.ml is supposed to be the community for Instance/server operators to communicate.
There’s a ticket to fix this on kbin which would allow each instance admin to block regular users from registering common names of authority: https://codeberg.org/Kbin/kbin-core/issues/359
Damn I gotta go lock in a @potus username before it’s too late
I think just banning them is enough. On other instances it will indicate they are on another instance.
deleted by creator
Doesn’t this depend on each instance though?
I think some form of blanket ban on certain keywords in usernames should be used. Admin being an obvious one, but I’m sure a lot more would also be problematic.
I guess what I meant is, how? It could be put into Lemmy sourcecode but since its open source that could be easily removed.
Each instance could possibly try and autoban any other instance user with that name?
just wow. Should be reported in github to main lemmy repo
Let’s not federate with that instance. Then, they can have any bots or username they want.
Usually I’d agree, but there has to be something more that can be done to prevent others from putting keywords like that in their name. Otherwise it’ll just happen again…
for other instances it’s name will appear as :
@admin@Podycust…so not such a big dealI think admin, administrator and those type names (system administrator, sys admin etc) should be reserved but you shouldnt ban admin as being part of a name. What about sadmin / sadminute… or badmin / badminute (and every variantion of that like MadMinotaur )and other variants like that.
Or anything relating to badminton the sport
Eh, why not? It’s just a name.
What if a persons real name is Admin in some weird language?
A bit far-fetched I know. Still, I think that if theres gonna be a global hardcoded blacklist of usernames, someone should be very careful which words is added to that list. Each specific instance would know better what words is good and what is bad in their main language(s).
deleted by creator
Then that sucks for them
This makes me want to legally change my name to admin admin
Ironically the link in OP is to the actual admin of this site
Official instance admin and community mod roles are denoted with badges, though. That’s consistent across every instance already.
I could change my name to admin and post here, but it wouldn’t give me any superpowers. Looking at my remote @admin user from a federated instance wouldn’t badge me as an admin for that instance.
I don’t see the problem or see how that affects anyone. There can be an @john on every instance. Is that confusing for users, too? Should every instance coordinate and make sure there’s only one @john to rule them all? Who is the best John, and how is that determined?
That’s just how the fediverse works.
