• Variants of Concern
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What a time to be alive, for the first time in all the years of working for this company we are moving some manufacturing out of the US so we can avoid tariffs when shipping to other countries. They are sending like half our team this month to train people in mexico how to build and test some of our products with talk that we will be doing something similar to build stuff in Asia

  • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Can we expect the CEOs to decline any raises of any kind during these trying times for our country and citizens?

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      they stopped as soon as TRUMP said he couldnt lower them, also eggs too,

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    i want them to prove it. just like with covid price hikes, and standard capitalism’s greed, I don’t believe them. at all.

    edit: downvoters - do you think I believe businesses were honest during covid? hell no. why downvote? businesses are all evil. how’s adam smith’s boot taste?

      • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Companies reached peak profits during the height of COVID, proving that the price increases were not primarily caused by supply issues.

        We’ve seen it more recently with egg prices greatly outpacing actual supply shortages.

        ‘supply and demand’ isn’t what sets a price, and hasn’t been for more than a century. Prices are simply set as high as the market can bear.

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Okay. Companies that raise prices, and use foreign labor and materials, are just going to get less of my money than those that are wholly domestic.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Why wouldn’t they? the domestic companies get to raise their prices by exactly the same amount in line with ‘what the market will bear’ and pocket the profits.

        • yata@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          When exactly did it used to be? We have archaeological evidence that stone age people kept long distance trade connections. Could you enlighten us as to when this fabled period of history occurred?

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 hours ago

          “Used to be.” I’ll assume you mean before Europeans arrived in 1492 and immediately started enslaving people, whose labor formed the majority of the value of the raw materials and crops they produced. Those people mostly disappeared because of new diseases that came over, so the slave labor was imported instead.

          Hell, even the Bronze Age is named after the alloy formed by combining copper and tin – from Tinland. People have been trading raw materials, and food/livestock, and manufactured goods since there were people.

          And why does a national border determine what’s a luxury and what’s not? Why not state borders? Why not county, city? Why not just draw a line around yourself and anything that comes from outside that line is a luxury? It’s entirely arbitrary.

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          12 hours ago

          even if your goal is valid, this is not the way to accomplish that

          you cannot cut off your arms in expectation of immediatelly evolving wings

          • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            i respect your opinion. The issue is that without causing severe economic pain to businesses, they’d never change away from the way they’ve been accustomed to doing business. So, businesses essentially have to be forced to do business as they’re told, or else close because they can’t make a profit in the regulatory environment. There must be a cost to looking outside the country for anything whatsoever which makes the act of searching so onerous that they’ll have trouble making a profit.

            Frankly, it needs to be both costly and labor-intensive if this is going to work. Every business should have to justify to the government every foreign purchase, sale, or labor. And they should have to pay more for it than for any possible domestic version.

            • Jhex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Let’s pretend for a moment we all agree that each country should be almost entirely self sustaining and that this is even possible.

              Now, how long do you think it would take for factories to be planned, designed, built, furnished and started? a day? maybe 2? or perhaps it would take years?!.. well it does take years but the tariffs are here now

              So let’s say you are a business owner and somehow magically have a piece of land lined up to buy, money and plans already made to bring production home. Tariffs are here now so you would be bleeding money while you build the factory… but wait, you invested in that plot of land and tariffs are removed 3 days after announcement… now it is still cheaper to buy your stuff abroad than ever build it here… what now? do you keep spending millions in a factory that will never be able to compete?

              And this is from the business perspective. The consumers of the USA, whose salaries have been stagnant for 40 years, will now have to face the severe economic pain until all these magical factories pop up from the ground like we are in a sims game.

              Even if the idea was not completely unfeasible, the way it’s been implemented is beyond idiotic

            • Triteer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              That’s just complete bullshit. A company doesn’t need to spend millions of dollars in legal fees to figure out which tariffs apply today to understand that locally made products don’t have tariffs. They need to know for certain that it’ll be more expensive to import in the future than build a domestic factory. It takes years to build a factory, today’s costs don’t matter, the costs in 5 years do.

              If the goal of the tariffs was to increase domestic production, they should have been phased in over time to give time for the factories to be built. The last month of chaotic tariffs meant that no company could figure out what production to move domestic. At some point in the chain, some things must be imported because they don’t exist in the United States. If a product contains rare earth elements, some portion of it will be imported from China since they process 95% of them in the world. So the question isn’t do we import it not, it’s what piece do we import. If companies knew exactly what the tariff rates are going to be, it still takes years to build a factory. That process won’t start until there’s a cost benefit analysis between paying tariffs and building a factory, and that analysis can’t start without knowing what the tariff rates are. With the tariffs being introduced, paused, resumed, cancelled within a month meant that no cost benefit analysis could be done because the costs might be wildly different tomorrow. Businesses won’t invest if they’re not certain the investment will pay off eventually, and with how chaotic tariff rates have been, no one can be certain, so no one is investing.

              Tariffs can be used to spur domestic production, but the way they were used over the last couple of months is not going to. Just like any tool, they need to be used the correct way to achieve the desired results.

            • Kissaki@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              All of that would be possible without causing severe economic pain.

              You can regulate through subsidies, tariffs, transport cost. If your goal is more domestic production and consumption you can do that without pushing market insecurity, arbitrary tariffs, etc. It’s possible in a more planned and controlled manner.