Clearview AI built a massive facial recognition database by scraping 30 billion photos from Facebook and other social media platforms without users’ permission, which law enforcement has accessed nearly a million times since 2017[1].

The company markets its technology to law enforcement as a tool “to bring justice to victims,” with clients including the FBI and Department of Homeland Security. However, privacy advocates argue it creates a “perpetual police line-up” that includes innocent people who could face wrongful arrests from misidentification[1:1].

Major social media companies like Facebook sent cease-and-desist letters to Clearview AI in 2020 for violating user privacy. Meta claims it has since invested in technology to combat unauthorized scraping[1:2].

While Clearview AI recently won an appeal against a £7.5m fine from the UK’s privacy watchdog, this was solely because the company only provides services to law enforcement outside the UK/EU. The ruling did not grant broad permission for data scraping activities[2].

The risks extend beyond law enforcement use - once photos are scraped, individuals lose control over their biometric data permanently. Critics warn this could enable:

  • Retroactive prosecution if laws change
  • Creation of unauthorized AI training datasets
  • Identity theft and digital abuse
  • Commercial facial recognition systems without consent[1:3]

Sources:


  1. Business Insider - Clearview AI scraped 30 billion images from Facebook and other social media sites ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  2. BBC - Face search company Clearview AI overturns UK privacy fine ↩︎

  • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fun fact: if you go to Clearview’s website to try and opt out, you can only opt out of individual images. So either you collect every possible image of yourself from the internet, or you fail.

    • Mika@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Honestly, we should just blow the companies that do this.

      Removing the web won’t fix shit, haven’t you learn from cyberpunk, next web is gonna be corpo run and privacy world be worse than ever.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Honestly, I’m kinda down for that. Not for the sake of a new Internet, but for the sake of all the tech companies like Meta and Google that could just turn into absolutely nothing in an instant. Like the Thanos snap but for big tech.

  • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    ↓ article fails t mention shadow profiles Meta made from every candid ϕoto📸 Meta users took. So even more innocent folks are affected by ↓θan ð NPDs o it.

    CONTR¹

    ↓: this t: to ϕ: ph/f θ: th ð: the o: in/on ¹ CONTR. Might abbr. t “CC,” or “Z.” “CTX” is mostly used o ⚕. Reply if u want a diff…

    ama if u need moa help decipherŋ. raison