QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3か月前no rulessh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1405
arrow-up1405imageno rulessh.itjust.worksQuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3か月前message-square35fedilink
minus-squareYoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up52·3か月前Hmmm…seems too ambiguous - gotta use standard syntax, hold up… ^(s|t)?hey?(?!m)$ ^t?h(e|i)(m|r)$ ^t?h(e|i){1,2}r?s$ Much better.
minus-squareYoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·3か月前Yeah I gave up on narrowing the scope, I ain’t that dedicated to the bit
minus-squarekibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3か月前You’re not necessarily wrong for it. The source material is nonsense to begin with, so who’s to say what the right test cases are?
Hmmm…seems too ambiguous - gotta use standard syntax, hold up…
^(s|t)?hey?(?!m)$^t?h(e|i)(m|r)$^t?h(e|i){1,2}r?s$Much better.
Passes:
shem
slaanesh will be pleased
Michael Jackson intensifies
Yeah I gave up on narrowing the scope, I ain’t that dedicated to the bit
You’re not necessarily wrong for it. The source material is nonsense to begin with, so who’s to say what the right test cases are?
I don’t see the problem.
^(they|he|she)$
Regex vibes