In many cases, young people are going into jobs without knowing their rights and without knowing what’s unsafe. Companies still don’t care even after $300,000 fines.

  • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is the key sentence

    A WorkSafe investigation found that the machine was not interlocked, which would have stopped it from starting while the guarding was open.

    As someone who works in heavy industry and programs machines similar to this type of gear…wow.

    The machine had been imported from China and had not been assessed by an engineer in NZ, was not certified and did not comply with NZ standards.

    I have seen this also. But you can’t just install gear without getting it certified to ASNZS4024 (the machine safety standard)

    Worksafe should fuck these guys.

    • passwordforgetter@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Even $300,000 fines won’t deter psychopaths. How much money do the managers have to pay personally? They should be banned from managing a business for 5 years. If someone abuses animals they can be banned from owning pets, so why do bad employers get the right to continue managing staff?

      • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Law change means that PCBO’s can now be held criminally responsible.

        If the manager is a PCBO (very likely) this shit is really serious.

          • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Worksafe will investigate and determine that.

            It will really depend on what is known by the management.

            If it common practice to bypass safety systems, then yes it is worse.

            If the operator went out of their way to get around things, then it won’t be.

            But also, if there was massive pressure for high production numbers, that will also be considered a significant factor.

            The detail really masters in these cases.

            • passwordforgetter@lemmy.nzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Good explanation but I wish that staff would quit in high numbers when companies value production targets more than safety. Nobody should have to die.

    • passwordforgetter@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I didn’t even know about the first case until last week. People need to stand up for themselves because many of these deaths are preventable. Stupid thing is, the previous fines probably had no effect. And this was after the pike river law when fines became larger.