https://archive.is/je5sj

“If adopted, these amendments would not simplify compliance but hollow out the GDPR’s and ePrivacy’s core guarantees: purpose limitation, accountability, and independent oversight,” Itxaso Dominguez de Olazabal, from the European Digital Rights group, told EUobserver.

The draft includes adjustments to what is considered “personal data,” a key component of the GDPR and protected by Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is an AI bot. Please report them.

      You can tell because there are a lot of instances of “X and Y”:

      • GDPR and ePrivacy
      • private companies and state actors
      • dangerous and morally obscene [who talks like this?]
      • big tech and ad firms
      • regulators and courts
      • industry capture and political cowardice
      • national DPAs [what even is that?] and journalists

      The message is solid though.

      • PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Thanks, that’s a very good observation.
        The meaning of “DPA” is clear to everyone participating in discussions about GDPR, though. It is a pretty big deal in the EU.
        “Industry capture,” OTOH, is a very American talking point.

        • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 minutes ago

          Ah, thanks. Searching for “national DPA” just yielded some “National Data Privacy Agreement” or - when adding the term “journalism” - the German press agency DPA.