• Kevin Russell@mstdn.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 hours ago

    @troyunrau

    Still stupid. Do not enter the US. This is advice.

    The US deports, and worse, 👉 people married to a US military spouse, during their green card interviews.👈

    They camp out at green card offices.

    If youre going to go back into danger because of a family emergency, do everything advised, and dont be slow.

    “Bring your documents” is a guess, a hope, possibly a delusion.

    #cdnpoli #canada

    • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, I was about to say this. They’re taking passports from naturalised AND native born Americans now. A piece of paper will not protect you from the Gestapo at the border. Cruelty is the point, and you’re not going to evade it by playing by the rules. Once you learn the truth of that, not entering the US just makes sense. Put our economy in a vice grip and stay away. That’s the only way to run the Shitgibbon out of office.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Ports of entry to the U.S. have access to a centralized database that collects information on criminal convictions in both Canada and the U.S., Global Affairs Canada says. The database also includes information on previous denials at border crossings.

    • Troy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I mean, our courts publish proceedings. Wouldn’t be hard to assemble a database from that info.

      The accuracy of such a database (particularly when interpreted by an AI) would be hugely suspect. Also, hard to argue with a database when you’re at the border being detained – the guy detaining you didn’t create the database.

      Whole thing reeks.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Agreed on all points.

        Writing something down has an interesting psycholigical effect. It increases the legitimacy of the words, even if they’re exactly the same as spoken. Someone made the effort, did the labour to write that down - wow - must be worth at least that much more than spoken word. Someone wrote down a whole lot of things in a collection - a database. All of a sudden the burden to argue with it jumps through the roof. It’s interesting.

        • Troy@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          On the flip side, I like that our courts publish proceedings. If we’re having an open and transparent society, and we want to trust in our institutions, then this transparency is required. An conundrum, to be sure.