[Intelligence adviser Nathalie] Drouin said officials did see some attempts to interfere during the last election, such as an attempt by China to affect a Conservative candidate’s campaign, attempts by Russia to engage in foreign interference activities online and attempts to use the names of politicians to promote cryptocurrency and financial activities.

However, Drouin said the attempts officials detected did not reach a level that would have affected election results.

However, Conservative MP Michael Cooper challenged Drouin and Morrison on that conclusion — pointing to the experience of Toronto-area candidate Joe Tay. Tay, a supporter of democracy in Hong Kong, has been targeted by Hong Kong authorities, who have put a bounty on his head.

Cooper said Tay and his supporters received threats during the campaign and Tay was advised not to campaign door-to-door for his own safety. Cooper said there was a drop in voter turnout in the riding and some of Tay’s supporters were summoned to the Chinese consulate.

While much of the focus on potential foreign interference in Canadian elections has centred on countries like China and Russia, Liberal MP Elisabeth Brière asked whether attempts to interfere in Canada’s next election could come from the United States.

Drouin said officials will be watching for potential interference, regardless of where it comes from.

“Canada has expectations regarding all countries, including the United States, that there is … no damage to our domestic affairs including our elections,” she said.

“We will monitor the situation in an agnostic way — regardless of which country tries to engage in foreign interference.”

  • jaselle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    People who agree with me politically are generally opposed to this sort of thing, meaning that this will be primarily used to influence things in favour of my political enemies. Feels bad.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    So my proposal is that if you’re found out using AI influencing bots, you face life in prison. Maybe we nip this shit in the early days by ruining lives that plan on ruining lives.

    If you run a company that does this, it’s dissolved and every member of the board of directors and their immediate family are prohibited from owning equity investments for 25 years.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Every election in the future is going to see AI generated deepfake bullshit.

    Hell, there are already fake AI commercials with “Carney” saying things he never said, and making claims that are the opposite of what his actual actions are.

    • ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I saw them. They were fucking stupid. I don’t like Carney for many reasons but using AI images of him and his voice to sell scam investments is unacceptable and he should sue those assholes to oblivion.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Our last one did have AI interference.

    If you’re just starting to plan for this you’re already 5 years too late.

    On top of that, X/Twitter is pure foreign interference. Facebook, TikTok, Google News are also foreign interference. All are proprietary algorithms, with no usable audit trail, owned by foreign companies, and tightly connected to the White House.

    TikTok would be the exception, but it’s regulated by the Chinese government in ways we cannot see or inspect.

    • Scotty@scribe.disroot.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      TikTok would be the exception, but it’s regulated by the Chinese government in ways we cannot see or inspect.

      How is Tiktok an exception? It’s the same as all the others, and China is quite famous for interference as the article also suggests.

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Exception in being Chinese and not American (I.e.connected to the White House). That’s it. That’s all.

        • Scotty@scribe.disroot.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, but it’s good that Canada’s strategy is country agnostic, regardless of who tries to engage in foreign interference. It’s bad here and there I would say.

    • L_N@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Canadians need to understand that it is advisable to modify the online services they use in order to avoid, as much as possible, using, for example, American social networks or listening platforms.

      We should not rely on only one source of resources; we must diversify the sources of the services we use, giving priority to Canadian services first.

      • grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Job creation idea: farms of propaganda specialists flooding the standard social media algorithms with messaging to help people think more critically, move off of techbro propaganda streams, and counter the bullshit that will be coming through. Make part of elections Canada, and track for possible recruits to CSE and CSIS, as well as for public affairs officers.