• big_dog_lemmy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        Perhaps a ranked voting system? Succession methodologies rarely work any better, and lead to all kinds of nepotism.

        • Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          We need nepotism in the Kernel, whomever takes over needs to be a long time developer with skills.

          Elections are great for steering committees and such it not for a huge highly technical piece of software that powers the world

    • SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This might be one of the few cases where democracy won’t actually work very well. If for no other reason than that I don’t think we can actually define the community in any useful way.

      Technocracy/meritocracy in this case is better, so long as disaffected groups can fork the kernel rather than be forced to accept what that leadership decides (they can).