• Freakazoid! @feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    sure, the vpns are the problem, not the stupid laws and systems. what a transparent maneuver. this isn’t about protecting children at all. thats about surpressing freedom. undemocratic as fuck.

    protecting citiziens my ass. this is an open attack on our privacy as it takes a powerful shield against greedy corporations.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    Ah, and now we see the real reason for “protecting the children”. Replace “children” with “media companies”.

  • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    Actually encryption is a loophole as well so better take a second third fourth look at that while we’re at it.

  • docus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Shitty title, it is not (yet) a EU position that VPNs need to be restricted. The article refers to a paper from EPRS aimed at (mis) informing EU lawmakers. The paper only says that ‘some’ consider VPNs a loophole that needs closing and states without providing any evidence that VPNs are increasingly used by minors to bypass age restrictions.