Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has signed the nation’s first law banning prediction market sites from operating in the state, the most far-reaching crackdown on massively popular services like Kalshi and Polymarket.

It comes as states confront a growing standoff with the Trump administration over how to regulate the industry, which allows people to bet on virtually anything.

The new state law makes it a crime to host or advertise a prediction market, which it defines as a system that lets consumers place a wager on a future outcome, like sports, elections, weather, live entertainment, someone’s word choice and world affairs.

The prohibition extends to services supporting prediction markets, like virtual private networks, that could allow consumers to disguise their location and get around the ban.

It would force prediction market sites like Kalshi and Polymarket to leave the state, or face possible felony charges. The law takes effect in August.

  • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    5 days ago

    Just FYI, sufficiently liquid prediction markets are also assassin markets by their nature.

    It’s a really easy way to facilitate payments for killings by “predicting” that someone will be dead by a certain date, and making a big bet against it

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      That isn’t really a new thing entirely, companies have our entire lives been able to take out life insurance on their employees without them knowing it. Which you know…

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        shield
        OPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        This was reported, so I looked it up. Apparently, it’s true. I also think it’s your opinion that corporations might use for their own financial gain, so I won’t remove it.

        Corporate ownership of life insurance (COLI), or corporate-owned life insurance, refers to insurance policies taken out by companies on their employees, typically senior-level executives.

        The company is responsible for making the premium payments, and if the person dies, the company, not the insured person’s family or other heirs, receives the death benefit. Such policies came to be called “dead peasant insurance” after some companies purchased life insurance on low-level workers without their knowledge.

        https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corporate-ownership-of-life-insurance.asp

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Oh right the dead peasants’ insurance thing this is like well after the fact, in like the 00s by walmart.

          I guess I should have just looked it all up how hard could have been.

          From what I understand they would take them out on technical employees fairly often as well, like scientists types that could not be easily replaced. But who knows what dirty dealings have gone on.

            • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Huh, I wonder if there’s a way we could subpoena the books of the life insurance companies they deal with. Or somehow obtain that information by whatever means.

              Walmart was a very bad company, they still are but I think they were one of the first retail Giants to become totally morally bankrupt.

            • stringere@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              If a Walmart employee dies on Walmart property the family gets a $1,000,000 payout. Source: am spouse of Walmart manager. This applies to all employees as far as I know.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          His opinion? Walmart was notorious for taking out life insurance policies on its rank and file workers. It happened for decades, there were even lawsuits, settlements, the whole 9 yards…

          • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            This is the first I’m hearing anything about it. I meant it as a good thing, so he doesn’t have to provide proof and all that.

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah that’s been common knowledge for decades and decades. Like Wall Street level they can sell life insurance policies on any of us without us knowing it, all they need is our social security number. It’s very unfair.

          I don’t have any ready sources this is from like the 90s and 2000s I mean I could look but whatever.

      • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Hey, I bet you a million dollars a guy I don’t like will still be alive tomorrow.

        If you take that bet. You have a significant financial interest in ensuring that guy I don’t like isn’t still alive tomorrow

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I know everyone else is pretending that they understood your original comment, but I actually really appreciate how much you clear it up with this response.

          Like there is no downside for the person making the bet, they actually accrue interest until it happens if there is any market volume on the bet.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          I get what you were saying, I just have never heard of this happening. Are there court cases or articles on it?

            • luciferofastora@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              We are proud to announce that we have created the Torment Nexus from the famous SciFi show “Don’t create the Torment Nexus”!

          • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            No idea about court cases but my great grandfather had stories of soilders betting on which commanding officer would be killed next by his own men. He was in the German military. My grandfather had similar stories from Vietnam.

            Dead pools or how ever you call them are a decently well known concept.

          • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            I’m pretty sure that legal wide scale prediction markets have been around for like 2 years so maybe give it time

            • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              I honestly wonder if there isn’t a deeper history. Gambling is a part of human culture and the only recent thing that’s happened is our society has become so corrupt that gambling is being allowed to legally flourish.

              Like bank deposit insurance, vaccines, and clean water standards, anti-gambling laws are something society is reminded it needs only after they are gone.

              • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Like bank deposit insurance, vaccines, and clean water standards, anti-gambling laws are something society is reminded it needs only after they are gone.

                Like laws against sex and drugs, gambling laws are in themselves a failure of government. We know criminalization is not needed, because societies that don’t criminalize imprison and murder less of their own people.

                Kidnapping and murder is bad

                • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  You can’t legislate morality. If you make gambling and drugs illegal they just go underground and become worse problems and foster a criminal underclass/organized crime that becomes a much bigger problem.

                  Better to keep them legal and put sensible controls on them, emphasis on sensible obviously that’s not what we have going on here. Outside of our freedom on marijuana in some states now at least when you don’t consider how anybody that drives a car can be arrested for impaired driving even if they’re totally sober from the marijuana. If they have smoked in the past week or two. That’s another story though.

                • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Well, the probably imprison less people because they are functioning much better as a society. The question is if imprisoning people is better than not imprisoning them in this fucked up society.

                  I’m in the US, but we generally lock up and/or deport way too many people; incarceration causes more problems than it solves, and serving white supremacy is the main social goal and outcoe.

                  But I think this is a separate conversation. The anti-gambling laws I’m talking about are the ones that would prevent constant Draft Kings advertisements and all the money that gets fed back into our political system. We’ve got so far away from acknowledging the damage that gambling causes, and gambling, as far as I’m concerned, is just a mugging with extra steps, yet paid propaganda has papered over the criminality.

                  • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    White supremacy is not the goal of the ones calling the shots with the money and the power, the white supremacists are tools they use, because they’re dumb.

                • Jiral@lemmy.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Yes, making insider trading easy, legal and profitable instead of risky, illegal and prosecuted, certainly does not fuel insider trading in whatever shape or form.

          • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            It’s basically, if there is a profit motive for something, it WILL happen. It’s a matter of when not if once these things are out there in the wild