I’ve played the original with a couple mods a few years back and had much fun. Thought about starting again and wondered if I need the DLC nowadays.

  • TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Note: I have played a heavily modded game with both Royalty and Ideology, not Biotech though.

    None of the DLCs are strictly necessary, but I would highly recommend Ideology - the core mechanics it adds are compelling and impactful, and it serves as a nice base for a huge amount of mods to build off it. Royalty isn’t bad either, but it seems more disconnected from the rest of the game than Ideology is.

  • flamekhan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recently did some Vanilla with my brother since he hadn’t splurged for all the DLC yet. It was still a ton of fun but missed having Idealigion. Just love all the depth it adds!

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    DLC are only really mandatory if you are playing with mods that require them.

    The base game of Rimworld is still chock full of stuff to do and stories to experience, and i always reccomend people play just the base game by itself before thinking about DLC or mods, because DLC adds so many mechanics and new items as to be completely overwhelming even if you have a familiarity with the base game, and if you have no familiarity? Good lord!

  • chillbo_baggins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah, the DLCs are great, but the base game is great too. Chess is good, but wizard’s chess is also good.

  • Shialac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its not mandatory, but a lot of mods nowadays require them. But if you want to play mostly Vanilla gameplay, you will be fine without them But I really recommend the DLCs, they add some really great game mechanics (and if you dont like them, they can be mostly ignored)

  • ___spannungsbogen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would say absolutely not. Modlists and the DLC are just the frosting on the cake. I’ve been playing since 1.17 and was straight vanilla until very recently when I snagged up Biotech because I wanted generational arcs to the stories I was playing. Not to knock mods at all. I go absolutely buckwild with mods on other games. Base Rimworld simply scratches that itch all by itself.

  • lemick24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recommend playing the base game and getting back into the swing of things, then get the DLC that interests you most once you’re hooked again. The DLC add a lot of content and can dramatically expand your play styles and experiences. There are tons of mods that can do the same for free too, and most don’t require any of the dlc. My personal favourite DLC is biotech!

  • mishii9029@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As others have said, the DLCs aren’t strictly necessary, but it’s good to have them. If you like playing modded, vanilla still has plenty of content. If you do decide to get a DLC I’d recommend Ideology, because it’s the most meta-changing DLC.

  • Space Sloth@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The dlc is good but not necessarily a prerequisite. Though a lot of content mods depend on assets from the dlc.

  • AverageGoob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would consider them mandatory for me. I’ve been playing RimWorld forever and feel like they add so much I could never go back to not having them.