• Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wow. This has been a thing in Canada for as long as I can remember. And I am, for Lemmy, damn near antediluvian.

    • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      We’ve had it in California for forever as well (hello fellow old person!) but it was only for aluminum soda/beer/sparkling water cans, plastic soda bottles and glass beer bottles. This measure is adding wine bottles, pouches and boxes, liquor bottles and juice jugs.

      • Lauchs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Knowing you’re a fellow old makes your username that much better, I now love it.

        Thanks for the clarification, that makes sense. I’m unsure how long we’ve been able to recycle those here. I’d assume for always but be not entirely surprised were that not the case.

      • rab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        In Canada, if it’s ‘ready to drink’ you can get the deposit back. So no coffee creamers or concentrated stock for example.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not all across Canada. Different provinces = different rules … ie: Manitoba has zero recycling for wine and liquor bottles (except for blue bin recycling).

        • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The NDP has won most provincial elections in Manitoba for the last 50 years, I would be surprised if the conservatives were able to block it here but not elsewhere.

          • Lauchs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s wild, I only really notice Manitoba during federal elections where, as far as I recall, conservatives have generally won. Any idea why the two differ? Or am I completely out to lunch?

            • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Back in the day Saskabush and Manitoba were traditionally NDP, because they’re both farm-based economies and the NDP developed out of the CCF.

              In the 80’s both provinces started a swing to the right so PC’s became the provincial alternate.

  • Magical Thinker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Moving from CA to a place with no aluminum recycling was initially weird, then my city completely stopped picking up all recycling… because staff shortages, so the world is full of surprises (guess what else they outlawed here…)

  • Caradoc879@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sensationalized article doesn’t mention at all that you’re going to be paying that when you purchase in the first place.

    • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s a local news site that just states the facts. California citizens already are aware they pay for it at the counter.

      Nothing about this is sensationalized

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, it’s kind of like those places that make you place a quarter in the shopping cart to use it, but it’s more annoying since you aren’t typically drinking at the store where you can return it. I get that it’s to encourage recycling, but what’s wrong with me throwing them in the recycling bin for regular street collection? In that case it’s still being recycled but I’m losing out on the fee for every single bottle/can which adds up.

      • Metz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Recyling can have multiple meanings. e.g in germany most bottles are meant to be used multiple times. e.g plastic bottles are refilled up to 20 times. throwing stuff in the recycling bin is only for things that are meant to be melted down and recast.

    • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s a quarter for boxed wine!! Really though, this title is misleading. It should say “California Redemption Value deposit charge to be added to liquor and juice containers starting in January.”

      They add it to the price of the product at checkout, it’s a “deposit” that you are able to get back if you want to save up your containers and drive them to the recycling center.

      I see this mostly benefiting people who make a few dollars a day digging through public (and not so public) trash receptacles looking for things with CRV to turn in.

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        It pisses me off that we have to pay any fee at all when we aren’t the ones who choose a product’s packaging.

        Companies should be paying the whole thing … including recycling costs. Then maybe they’d start packaging responsibly.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          For things that can’t be recycled, I would agree. But if it can be, then it still needs to be brought to a recycling facility to make that happen. Without this incentive, a lot more of it will end up in landfills.

          • Electromechanical_Supergiant@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            If the companies had to pay per bottle, do you really think they’d still be using single use packaging like that?

            They’d install refill stations in stores and sell you a reusable bottle that you can fill up from their metered tap at the refill station.

            Companies created the problem of single use packaging; the onus is not on individuals to solve a problem created by companies.

            • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Not if it costs more to develop, install, and maintain a refill system. Much more likely they would just raise the price to the consumer anyway.

              • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                If gov’ts had kept on top of the companies and created prohibitive rules around single-use plastics (and chemical use … see PFOS/PFAS) in the 70’s, we wouldn’t be having this discussion.

                Instead they just let companies do whatever they wanted 'cause capitalism is god.

                • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  And now it’s so far gone that doing the bare minimum for the environment is great for their image so let’s dump more money into advertising that than actually making a meaningful change.

            • howrar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              If the companies had to pay per bottle, do you really think they’d still be using single use packaging like that?

              If it’s the same 5/10/25c per container, then they very likely will. Consumers have already decided that this price is worth paying for the convenience, so it makes little difference if companies paid this and passed on the cost to consumer, or if it’s transparently shown as a separate reimbursable fee. In the end, all the costs get passed on to consumers and it’s left to us to vote with our wallets. I think the main issue is that the cost of producing containers doesn’t reflect the true long term cost, and the solution to that is probably to impose a tax based on the amount of material used. That way, consumers making the choice that’s right for them will also mean making the choice that’s right for everyone else.

    • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      In my Canadian province, a mandatory deposit has been in place since 1970. I didn’t even realize this wasn’t standard elsewhere.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    They are introducing this in Ireland in 2024. Starting with cans and hard plastic containers. I think it’s a great idea. I do hope they expand it to include glass bottles though.

    • Jumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      As a German let me tell you it’s great. It always feels good to get money for bringing back empty stuff

    • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Coca cola in particular had been lobbying against these systems for decades. People buy less if the cost is higher, so instead they want their dumb packaging to be spread everywhere.

      Beautiful profit interest saves us all

  • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I was trading empty bottles and jars for some money since I was a kid in Estonia. That system is older than the Russian Federation.