Today we’re making signing up on Mastodon easier than ever before. We understand that deciding which Mastodon service provider to kick off your experience with can be confusing. We know this is a completely new concept for many people, since traditionally the platform and the service provider are one and the same. This choice is what makes Mastodon different from existing social networks, but it also presents a unique onboarding challenge.
    • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
      2·
      2 years ago

      I personally don’t really care for this change, but it would have been nice - although I understand it would have taken significant time/effort to develop that could be used in other areas with the limited resources - if there was some criteria to create a selection of instances that would be randomly selected based on something like:

      1. instance age - Your instance must be active for N months/(years?) to qualify to ensure rando spawns that may die a week later don’t impact users, as well as being able to track the next rule:
      2. instance reliability - If there is a way to track this, only include instances that meet a specific number and maintained it for the last N months. It would suck to throw users into an unreliable instance, or one that started off great but started going south in the last 3 months.
      3. same server rules and privacy policy - To ensure a “family friendly” set of default instances that people could easily join without having to overthink it.

      Not sure what else they could track, but those three would be a good start, though admittedly a lot of additional work.

  • ThePJN@sopuli.xyz
    2·
    2 years ago

    I know what they’re going for but yeah it does seem like an iffy move to sign everyone up for a main server. Unless they’re letting people get settled and then emailing/encouraging them after a couple weeks/months to change instances?

    Problem with that being that most people won’t want to move after setting things up in the first place.