New publisher, who probably doesn’t like gog

Wonder what happened that caused the designer / studio to part ways at such a critical point.

Well the biodegradable part seems a given, as that’s the key point of the article. That alone would probably be worth it for a lot of applications.

It did specify those traits are under testing now.

Pfft, noob. He just has to go back and stop himself from going back to stop the plague.

I have some bad news for you about your education system

deleted by creator

What new knowledge have YOU contributed to humanity?

How does it fix it? I’m familiar with the rules but not the lore

On 2nd read, you’re right, it could actually have been written that way

deleted by creator

Obviously. Who expected any other response?

Da fuck you comparing an acronym to censorship?

Ffs, don’t normalise bullshit censoring of curse words

I main Linux. I’ve been using it for over 2 decades. I’m speaking from personal experience when I say that if you think Linux was mainstream ready prior to the last few years, you have no idea what the average pc user is incapable of.

Most people don’t really use windowns because they like it but because of the third parties applications that only run on windows

Most techies, maybe. MAYBE. Linux has not been anywhere near user friendly enough over the past 2 decades to be remotely usable by normal people. Not a chance.

Idk about that. Assuming we’re talking sex with no emotional connections, we’re (as a species, regardless of outliers) biologically wired to find teenagers and young adults the sexiest, since they’re going to trigger most of the signs our subconscious is looking for.

Just look at the data from pornhub et al. It’s undeniable.

Probably one of those cultural things that differs by locale

fueled the windows ecosystem for two decades.

That’s nonsense, as if Windows needed any help being dominant in its heyday