China is also opening new coal plants iirc. A few years ago I heard that if my home country (Sweden) stopped all co2 emissions today, the co2 savings would have been wiped out in a week, by China opening new coal plants.

The US might have gone dumb, but that does not make China good.

Feel free to cross post. I just put up content that I find interesting and that I think others might also want to check out.

Do it have to have an account on piefeed to post there?

Caveat, is that a synonym for felon?

Everything has benefits and drawbacks, question is if the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. I think it does personally, because a strong EU can stand up to the US and China.

Down almost 5% from western Europe in 2025. I thought (hoped?) that the drop would have been bigger.

Can we please stop voting articles down just because we disagree about the subject at hand?

Agreed. I’m not a fan of militarism, but it’s pretty clear that Pax Americana is over, so we need our own defence industry. Sad as it is.

I2p?

Thank you. I love Switzerland, but they (you) benefit massively from the EU, as does all member states. Pretending otherwise it’s just dumb.

We stand together or we get eaten by the US or China. Simple as.

What do you mean with “… let their economy be too dependent on EU labour and interconnected with EU”?

A large company with deep pockets, with the ability to influence politics, so yes, I’d say it does matter.

Germany iirc. So yes, they know.

The living standard is also much higher now. More people expecting more help from the state with more complex problems. Let’s for example take a premature baby that would have died 20 years ago can now be saved and can live a long life, but needing 24x7 care by medical staff. Or the fact that our parents and grandparents live longer, but care and medicine cost a lot more.

I’m not disputing that the top takes too much, but the standard of care, medicine and other things cost too.

Do they want more migration? Because this is how you get more migration.

Not surprised.

As much as I hate those silly headlines I don’t change them. The editor will have to live with the shame.

So that’s reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon and incompetence instead.

The shooter should still be prosecuted.

How is this not assault with a deadly weapon? She’s there working, clearly not a threat.

That cop should be prosecuted.

Archive link: https://archive.is/tiaLg

Forgot, sorry.

I’d say yes and no. The strain on the planet would lessen for sure. But then we have the dependency ratio, meaning the amount of people in work related to those out of work, like children, the elderly, disabled etc.

This are getting worse in every European country. More babies won’t fix it, at least not in the short term but it’ll lessen the impact in about 20 years.

To fix the dependency ratio you either drasticly reduce the welfare state, increase the retirement age, raise taxes, or accept a lot of immigrants. Any of those options appealing to the general public you think?