

Damn, yet another generation that could afford to save…


Damn, yet another generation that could afford to save…
Occam’s razor. Why would you take a screenshot or picture of something, but crop part of the thing you want to post about out? It makes no sense…
I would fall in love as well. Which is a problem, because I’m straight.
I genuinely think there’s no other reason to do it. Like, if I show you a picture of my grandmother, but I cropped half of her face off, how would that not be your first comment!?
For the why, I was just speculating. But for the what, it’s instantly obvious to everyone. When ALCOHOL gets cropped to )L, it’s abundantly clear the image has been heavily edited.
What a wild crop. If you have to go so far to avoid attributing something to another person, just remake the whole thing.


In the Control Center, making sure to nuke them from space. I know these are all statistically not aggressive, but I just can’t shake the instinctive impulse to eradicate them…
It might be a cultural thing. I’ve been yelled at for nibbling on someone’s elbow before…


Everything is so backwards. Releasing facts and proof someone knowingly trafficked children to be raped might have an affect on their appeal!? That’s exactly why they need to be released. So the crimes that happened have a light shown on them, and victims have a chance for some semblance of justice.


Ha! I can do that without an expensive headset.


And they’re allowed to. But this is not that.
…the HDMI Forum (which manages the official specifications for HDMI standards) has officially blocked any open source implementation of HDMI 2.1. That means the open source AMD drivers used by SteamOS can’t fully implement certain features that are specific to the updated output standard.


Assholes.

Oh, buzz off.


It’s an interview you hate-watch because you don’t like the interviewer. Completely reasonable…


Something gets popular, people have to demonstrate how unique and sparkly they are by going against it, it’s a tale as old as time. I watch their videos occasionally and understand he’s neither demon nor god. But try listening to their WAN Show podcast and tell me he’s not (mostly) genuine and open…
Nice try. We know you’re a frog!
Woah, is that true!? Never, not even from one with rabies or something!?


I don’t believe you.


No Antarctica?
Relax. I’m allowed to state my opinion, you’re allowed to disagree. If we’re still not on the same wavelength, it’s fine, but we don’t need to make it a big thing.
I have never in my life seen people crop part of their own image out of the the post they themselves chose to post so no, Occam’s razor does apply. But again, you’re allowed to disagree. But wherever you got the image from, it was edited, that’s a fact…