If you want to be so specific, maybe don’t use “never” when you literally said “boil” in the previous frame
If you want to be so specific, maybe don’t use “never” when you literally said “boil” in the previous frame
It’s more: that’s boob 69, ass eat and probably something else using all characters for the third one too, anyone see it?
Never would have guessed that lol 😂
And 8 c on tent
7 is probably wise (y’s)


Interesting, I put linux on my work laptop and I always get hours more out of it than my colleagues using windows. And I’m the type of guy having 200 tabs open and carrying extra peripherals around which probably also take some power.
Anyway ymmv of course


Nobody says you’re a quack because you believe or want to research extraterrestrial life. Scientists might call you a quack for claiming something “beyond a doubt” without any evidence.
Close, but now you come into contact with the atmosphere not actually being the same density (in weight/volume as well as in particles/volume) throughout, but instead gets thinner as you get away from the earth.
For simplicity, assume space is actually empty, and the atmosphere gets thinner linearly up until x kilometers above sea level it’s completely empty. Then the density will also decrease with height, and the helium balloon will eventually find a spot that matches its density, and stop there.
Again there’s so much more to it but as a simplified model this works 😅
Rockets mostly need to fight speed (of the earth revolving around the sun), and indeed in our atmosphere speed means friction, but in space rockets still need a lot of propellant to change their trajectory. As always there’s a relevant xkcd: https://what-if.xkcd.com/58/
The very short answer is that gas pressure is mostly proportional to the amount of particles per volume.
So a balloon filled with helium has X particles per cubic cm, while the air around it has the same amount (instead of getting crushed). But because helium is a lot lighter per particle than standard air, this makes the balloon lighter than air, and like trying to push an air-filled balloon underwater, this helium-filled balloon floats to the higher layers of air, until other smaller forces also start to matter and the balance is restored.
So a “vacuum-filled” balloon has nothing to give counter-pressure, but a balloon filled with helium definitely does.


I agree, it could be a last resort when things like ghostery or such fail, but otherwise there’s enough crap saturating the wires, no need to artificially inflate that
I like the theory where (one of) the “great filter(s)” is just the likelihood of a technologically advanced civilization emerging from a greedy society is just way more likely than from a complacent society. So at some point some creature somewhere gets some critical mass of tech fueled by greed, this leads to global domination (humans over animals, as well as europeans over their colonies).
Without the greed, there would not have been the technological advantage, but due to this same greed we now have weapons of mass destruction strong enough to wipe any semblance of intelligent life from the planet.
Of course this theory is very black and white (not to mention capitalistic). Perhaps a curious society is also an option to reach technological advantage but not global domination, but would such a society manage to become a Kardashev type I civilization by sharing rather than conquest?
So to directly answer your question: I think it’s likely that someone would have enslaved most of the earth somehow, (which absolutely does not excuse it). It’s surprisingly good that humans on average dislike the idea of slavery and colonisation now, so maybe we can build on top of that a society of curiosity and progress instead of one of war and a (literal) dead end.


Sounds interesting, want to share a minimal example?
August is the 8th month so still correct 🥳
There’s lots of good uses for AI, but people seem to equate AI with LLMs these days so I feel the need to point out that this is not a good use case for LLMs

Tldr: vibe coding is for “expert coders” who don’t like to code but instead want to do code reviews of “coders” who never learn. No thanks, I actually like coding


It’s not false if the event changes the environment around it, which was my point.
That’s literally a visual cue


Fun little puzzle, thanks for sharing!


Lmao, seems like some people are forgetting peaceful strikes were the alternative to guillotines. Taking away the peaceful option might not end up the way they hope…
To any other username that would have been uncalled for sass, but you of all people should have noticed the joke 🤣
On Linux I’m a big fan of meld, but while typing this I realize from the community you’re probably looking for android apps?