Every bit of code a maintainer accepts becomes their responsibility to maintain. Considering that half the time „improvements” don’t even have tests to help maintaining them, feel free to maintain your own fork.
Every bit of code a maintainer accepts becomes their responsibility to maintain. Considering that half the time „improvements” don’t even have tests to help maintaining them, feel free to maintain your own fork.
„How do you know” is such a powerful question.
I especially like the Electrolux one. It’s simple, memorable, and once you see a butt and bikini, you can’t unsee it.
Thanks, I hate it!


Think about the children! But also ew…


For a public infrastructure, unattended remote updates are a vulnerability. This is clearly and openly explained in the article.
Especially for countries where vast majority of workforce commutes using said infrastructure. A single uncontrolled update could cripple not just transportation, but every other public service.


The Chinese model featured a SIM card that allowed the manufacturer to remotely install software updates that made it vulnerable, whereas the Dutch model did not.
Everything you needed to know was openly stated in the article. But you love riding that imaginary tall horse of yours.


Sir, this is sh.
If you guessed it right, your inflexible implementation becomes an advantage against other inflexible implementations.
There, I generated an AGI (actual grumpy ignoramus) summary for y’all.
Power users rebase with squashes and fixups multiple times a day. Especially if the job’s integration process isn’t enforcing long living branches.
Reflog is useful then, because you literally rewrite history every rebase.


Most countries actually do recognize Palestine as a sovereign state. Ukraine is one of them too.
Bringing Israel—the country that acts almost indistinguishable to Russia from day one—into this argument wasn’t a good idea.


Cryptos are not anonymous. A currency based on an open publicly negotiated and independently verifiable transaction ledger is antithetical to anonymity.


This digital euro is specifically about having a single eminent control and track your money even at rest - something Visa and Mastercard would gladly sacrifices a population of a medium sized country to achieve.


G-d, how the hell is “mastercard and visa are monopolies” used as a reasoning for surveillance currency?
Have Danes been visiting ECB lately?
However you like, REST doesn’t dictate anything there. Just be consistent and use hypermedia.
JSON APIs almost never follow REST because they almost never use JSON as hypertext. Worse, no complete stable hypertext JSON standard exists. There’s JSON-HAL, but it lacks a way to represent resource templates (think HTML’s <form>).
Therefore, with JSON APIs ignoring one of the most basic idea behind REST, why would anyone expect them to follow another idea of REST - consistency?
REST is a deceptively simple concept. Any time you build an HTML website a human can navigate without consulting documentation, you’re doing it better than vast majority of swagger documented corporate APIs.
JSON API almost always means “not REST”. In other words, it works as intended.


I can’t muster any sarcasm out of sheer disappointment. You win this time…


The maximum age hasn’t changed because its increase is irrelevant for the sake of trait propagation. In fact, fast breeding population with regular turnaround can deal with environmental fluctuations way better than a long living one.
There’s nothing inherent to multicellular biology that prevents immortality. Every problem preventing us from living longer and healthier has been solved by evolution somewhere else. Often in a way that’s insultingly similar to how our bodies already work. Hell, good chunk of solutions is present in our genome never to be expressed!
But then evolution is all about populations of borderline inadequate survivors. Turns out, being depressed, hurting, and cancerous in your fifties is just good enough.


No, my argument is that Russia’s and Russians’ actions are consistent across multiple statehoods and governments, making any attempt at redeeming them by shifting blame to a specific government an example of mental gymnastics.
Only actual attempts at taking responsibility for what Russia has been doing should count. And frankly, those Russians that do take responsibility—many of whom already got disappeared—will get erased from history and from possible future definition of „Russia” if Russia is not taken seriously to be your enemy here and now.
If you tar the contents of the two, you’d be unable to attribute the archives to any specific one.