Oh interesting, technicalities like? I wrote to a bunch of politicians and I was assured that they rejected it on principle.
Maybe they lied to me. But why would they lie to me but not the general public? Maybe the EU is a bunch of politicians and they all have their own opinions.
“Europe… the guys that want backdoor into all encrypted communications” is a weird thing to say considering that every attempt of such a law failed because they didn’t have the majority.
“Europe… where a minority of politicians have continually failled to get a backdoor into all encrypted communications” would be far more accurate.
It speaks to their confidence. Your lack of confidence is why you aren’t a top assassin.
They usually don’t do it professionally.
As i understand it and what is interesting to me, is that they f… A programmer, not programmers and that exclusively and professionally.
A professional programmer f… wow that is a job?
The whole argumentation fails apart if you ask yourself a simple question, is the meme transformative to the art that it is using. As you already stated, “in a way the creator never foresaw” highly implies a transformative nature.
But isn’t ai art transformative? Oh it might be. But well, the company making the ai, stole art to create the model. There is no transformative step between the art piece and the version of the art piece that they use to train the ai. It is stolen art but not because the model steals, but because the model is built on stolen art. Everything that an ai model can produce is based in stolen art. So any similarities are not a little reference to some other art piece but stolen art. As the whole model is based on similarities, it produces exclusively content that has similarities to that stolen art. And if everything is a reference to stolen art, the ai art become effectively stolen art.
But what about people and their faces? Yeah i don’t think you should use/make those memes, unless the people are public figures. But not because it is stolen art, as the memes tend to be transformative, but because everyone has a right to privacy.
Master was just always a bad name for it.
Flowcharts are where the tech debt starts tbf
The problem is not the detection system or that people don’t believe it.
The problem is that people don’t seem to understand the utility of behaving like something is true while “knowing” it is not true.
E.g. let’s say, I “know” the gun is not loaded, should I point the gun at a friend and pull the trigger? No.
Verifying information before acting in a way that would put people in danger, is worth wasting time for.
I like this meme because hahaha Jordan Peterson dumb. But also, It makes me feel better for liking butts more.
Or your employer would invest some money in a proper tool for your job.
So it is an ad for certifications that makes me feel sad for people who chase after them?
now I really wanna get the certificates…
I would call myself a feminist because I believe in equality. You know, fuck sexism.
Everyone! She is saying that she is jealous that her husband is content and she is trying so hard and unhappy. She isn’t shaming her husband. She is questioning herself.
I don’t think it will take over. I think idiots will deploy ai everywhere and that will create systems that are fundamentally inhumane.
I mean more surveillance, more arbitrary “decisions” by opaque systems. Basically Oppression by lack of oversight and control.
Is getting downvoted hurting your feelings? 🥹 Awww. Do you need a hug?
Oh wait, I mean, get a thick skin!
You sound quite butthurt over being called a bad person. Maybe you should get a thicker skin. Have a good one.
For better usage: you don’t need to write it into console. Just write it in an array!