• 9 Posts
  • 1.38K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle



  • It’s like you don’t read these things at all?

    Her definition and study of totalitarianism are still intellectually relevant, but hey, if she had a blue car instead of a red car, then of course I see your point.

    Do you all go to the same school of completely missing the point and having the most ludicrous rhetorical responses?





  • It was more “you lose credibility when you make a grotesque thesis statement, both in substance and on the form”.

    The form is sufficiently obvious I suppose. If I call you an edgy moron even before you disagree with me, you’re not exactly looking for a nice conversation.

    On the merits of the existence of authoritarianism, dismissing the work of someone like Adorno - just like that - is genuinely hilarious.


  • Thanks for providing us with an example! I almost had forgotten what it meant, being too busy with the Reddit losing and whatnot. Sorry I have to go there is this sponsored post about investing in crypto - I could lose a massive amount of money and dignity, can’t pass the opportunity.


  • Wait, now this needs some clarification. Is it anti-communists as someone who is against communists or anti-communists as people who share a hatred of communism? Because one might be downright libelous

    But thanks for your reactivity, I feel like lib is a bit lazy





  • drolex@sopuli.xyztoSocialism@lemmy.mlAuthoritarian!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Authoritarianism is a meaningless term used by edgy children whose brains haven’t fully developed yet

    You tend to lose a bit of credibility when you start your argument with this kind of sentences. After that you would need to prove that your reasoning is at least as qualitative, as, say, Hannah Arendt’s work, and unfortunately it is far off the mark.