

This is a variation of a very old philosophy called legalism. They didn’t have HDI and GDP in those days, but the idea was that you should judge civil servants and government policies based on objective results rather than morality. It worked when there was a strong and relatively neutral emperor / chancellor to make and enforce those judgements impartially. In the modern day, Singapore might be an example of this. But the problem is that you still need a strong and relatively neutral institution to make and enforce judgements fairly.

















Is an anti-sanctions system really needed now? Iran can demand their toll in rubles, yuan, or a BRICS currency (if it ever materialises), and anyone who wants to trade in Middle Eastern oil will have to break sanctions. Russia can do the same for its oil.
Now this would be very useful.