• 7 Posts
  • 705 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle













  • I suspect it’s because the characters in Japanese at least, all take up exactly the same sized box. We find English easier to read when it uses a proportional font, so different letters take up different widths.

    Also, Japanese is commonly written top to bottom, left to right, in printed materials but left to right, top to bottom, when handwriting or for casual text. Once in a while, though, they do top to bottom, right to left. I’ve seen this in temples, so I think it’s a traditional format.

    In my mind, left to right, top to bottom make sense when writing with ink, because then your hand doesn’t smudge the already-written characters. Unless you are a lefty, of course.


  • I haven’t cared about professional hockey for a couple of decades now.

    I noticed that their business model turned into cultivating fans. Fans by tickets and merchandise at unreasonable prices, regardless of the quality of hockey and the way that the fans are treated. That’s the way you maximize the profit you can extract.

    For example, take the Toronto Maple Leafs. I’m in my 60s, and I was 5 years old when they last won the Stanley Cup. Yet season tickets range from $2300 to $28,000 each, with an upfront fee that can be more than $100,000. And there is a 20-year waiting list. An extreme example, but also a perfect example of a franchise abusing its willing fans.

    You see it with the marketing surrounding national teams as well. I first noticed this when I was living in japan, and my kids became confused about whether they should root for their father’s Canadian team, or their mother’s Japanese team. I wondered why they should have to choose, and why we shouldn’t just appreciate the beauty and thrill of competition rather than identifying with one side.





  • That would be fine if the book was to be an objective, historical approach. But how likely do you think that is, as opposed to a self-serving screed to push her own agenda?

    Are we going to get an honest critique of the Liberal politicians with whom she worked and politicked? An exposé of things that should have been but weren’t, or that shouldn’t have been but were? People who should or shouldn’t have been successful, in either case to the detriment of the country?

    Put simply, I don’t see that there could possibly be anything of value in this kind of first-person account.