Ah. That explains it - thank you.
The catarrhine who invented a perpetual motion machine, by dreaming at night and devouring its own dreams through the day.
Ah. That explains it - thank you.
Wait. There’s some really weird federation lag going on:
I ended checking the posts from my instance, but the modlog straight from LW. Anyway, the comm is locked and modless.
Also your Result is wrong, since that community is still accessible?
The community is locked, empty, modless, and the modlog shows that all moderator removals were done by the admins. For all intents and purposes the comm was removed.
It was just something silly to make me drop my guard a wee bit. I was scared, and he noticed it.
That’s from 1984. More specifically, “the book” inside the book.
…I hate how poorly people understand 1984, how much they distort it, putting words in Orwell’s mouth. And, in the process, they miss little gems like this one.
That’s a good one!
We don’t need to lie about it; not even by omission.
In the best case scenario, Meta is employing an automated moderation system, it’s incorrectly tagging what users share as “spam”, and can’t be arsed to fix the issue in due time - note that this was already attested at least September 2024. That’s more than enough to blame Meta.
Given Meta tells the truth, but I don’t see any reason to doubt this.
I see quite a few reasons to not trust = be gullible towards what Meta says. Starting by the fact that it’s on its best interests to silence mentions to competitors.
Even if it was a honest mistake (is it? I have my doubts.), I don’t think that “we” (people in general) should give it a pass. On its best it highlights how unfair those automated systems are towards the users; plus Meta is in a position that it should be held responsible for what it does, regardless of its “intentions”.
Meta be like:
“Calling LGBTQ+ people «mentally ill»? No, we can’t remove that, it would be censorship.”
“Linking to a competitor that doesn’t ? NO, YOU CAN’T DO THAT! No, we aren’t totally censoring you, we’re, uhm, you’re totally spamming! Yeah, that’s it, you’re spam!”
I think that people can - and should - capitalise on Streisand Effect against Meta.
Most of my dumb jokes don’t work in English, but here’s some that do:
Stop looking me weird when I eat banana with gorgonzola, folks! It’s actually tasty.
Also, at least in my chunk of South America, people look at the eggs+pork combo as something outright gross, but I got to admit that I love some pork sausages with fried eggs.
I drink half cola half wine. People scream bloody murder at me. I don’t care - it’s awesome. (If trying it do it with cheap wine, it’s a waste to do it with good wine.)
I’ve seen plenty people eating ham with melons, so this combo doesn’t look weird at all for me.
Portuguese is more conservative on analysis; like, the phonemic inventory doesn’t change that much from Continental Proto-Romance. But once you look at the surface, you find a bunch of weird stuff, like:
There’s also a bunch of phenomena that appear in both, but got stigmatised in Portuguese and accepted in Spanish. A good example of that is yeísmo - it does pop up in Portuguese but it’s associated with rural people, and seen as “poor speech”.
Sorry for the wall of text.
Hey, I ain’t dissin’ Chilean varieties!
…plus my native language (Portuguese) is a lot like “Spã’ish but you’re too lazy to prõ’ounce a few softer cõsonants, so you simp’y skip them.”, accordingly to some folks.
I remember a fair bit of my early childhood:
Thank you! Sadly, I don’t talk too much about PIE in Lemmy because… well, it’s kind of a niche subject that most users don’t care too much about.
Feel free to ask for further info on stuff, though. I do enjoy talking about it!
Using it as a warning is fine, but you can’t do it if you’re against banning people, like the other user is.
Then they’ll say that God is probing them, or that it’s a sign of Apocalypse, or that he was sending to heaven the just among them, all that shit. They love double standards, even if their bible says that God hates them (Proverbs 20:23).