From the article:

involves these nine principles:

    Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the “facts.”
    Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.
    Arguments from authority carry little weight — “authorities” have made mistakes in the past. They will do so again in the future. Perhaps a better way to say it is that in science there are no authorities; at most, there are experts.
    Spin more than one hypothesis. If there’s something to be explained, think of all the different ways in which it could be explained. Then think of tests by which you might systematically disprove each of the alternatives.
    Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it’s yours. It’s only a way station in the pursuit of knowledge. Ask yourself why you like the idea. Compare it fairly with the alternatives.
    See if you can find reasons for rejecting it. If you don’t, others will.
    If whatever it is you’re explaining has some measure, some numerical quantity attached to it, you’ll be much better able to discriminate among competing hypotheses. What is vague and qualitative is open to many explanations.
    If there’s a chain of argument, every link in the chain must work (including the premise) — not just most of them.
    Occam’s Razor. This convenient rule-of-thumb urges us when faced with two hypotheses that explain the data equally well to choose the simpler. Always ask whether the hypothesis can be, at least in principle, falsified…. You must be able to check assertions out. Inveterate skeptics must be given the chance to follow your reasoning, to duplicate your experiments and see if they get the same result.

They definitely exist, but I’ll agree that the ones in the video are very clean. Too clean? Idk. https://www.valaisblacknosesheepsociety.org/

Ok thanks. This is helpful. I’ll try a fresh install.

cartes.app has a beautiful interface that compares all modes of transit but it doesn’t seem to do much outside of France.

Lol that’s a nice catch

Edit: maybe “peer at eFrance” or something that makes more sense in french.

Hell yeah, peertube has the video: https://peerate.fr/w/2ktPxQgBvDHdHWzogVTRvH

While I appreciate his investments in science, he has some pretty awful ideas:

https://www.businessinsider.com/eric-schmidt-google-ai-data-centers-energy-climate-goals-2024-10?op=1

Wow the public transit navigation is amazing in that app. It reminds me a lot of mapy.com but it’s open source!

Here you go Minneapolis, there is apparently no ICE anywhere: https://arcg.is/0TuDW11

• At the time of posting it only shows the no fly zones for the airports and one for the air force located at the airport.

If a convoy is unmarked or if they identify themselves as police but they are actually DHS, you could easily violate this NOTAM without ever knowing it.

The original text is here: https://tfr.faa.gov/tfr3/?page=detail_6_4375

But it’s not mobile friendly so:

FDC 6/4375 FDC PART 1 OF 4 SECURITY NOTICE…NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISORY FOR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) OPERATIONS IN PROXIMITY TO SELECT LOCATIONS AND MOBILE ASSETS NATIONWIDE. THIS NOTAM REPLACES NOTAM FDC 5/6378. PURSUANT TO 14 CFR SECTION 99.7, SPECIAL SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS (SSI), ALL UNMANNED ACFT ARE PROHIBITED FROM FLYING WITHIN A STAND-OFF DISTANCE OF 3000FT LATERALLY AND 1000FT ABOVE UNLESS INDICATED BY THE FAA BY NOTAM OR OTHER MEANS. TO: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD), DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), AND DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) FACILITIES AND MOBILE ASSETS, INCLUDING VESSELS AND GROUND VEHICLE CONVOYS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED ESCORTS, SUCH AS UNITED STATES COAST GUARD (USCG) OPERATED VESSELS. PURSUANT TO 49 U.S.C. SECTION 40103(B)(3), THE FAA CLASSIFIES THE AIRSPACE DEFINED IN THIS NOTAM AND IN FURTHER DETAIL BY THE FAA WEBSITE IDENTIFIED BELOW AS ‘NATIONAL DEFENSE AIRSPACE’. UAS OPERATORS WHO DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES MAY FACE THE FOLLOWING ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS: THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MAY PURSUE CRIMINAL CHARGES, INCLUDING CHARGES UNDER 49 USC SECTION 2601161905-2710291430 END PART 1 OF 4 FDC 6/4375 FDC PART 2 OF 4 SECURITY NOTICE…NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISORY FOR 46307; AND THE FAA MAY TAKE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION, INCLUDING IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTIES AND REVOKING FAA CERTIFICATES OR AUTH TO OPERATE UNDER TITLE 49 USC SECTIONS 44709 AND 46301. IN ADDITION, UAS OPERATORS WHO ARE DEEMED TO POSE A CREDIBLE SAFETY OR SECURITY THREAT TO PROTECTED PERSONNEL, FAC, OR ASSETS MAY BE MITIGATED PURSUANT TO 10 U.S.C. SECTION 130I, 6 U.S.C. SECTION 124N, AND 50 U.S.C. SECTION 2661. OR OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL AUTHORITY. MITIGATION MAY RESULT IN THE INTERFERENCE, INTERCEPTION, SEIZURE, DAMAGING, OR DESTRUCTION OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT DEEMED TO POSE A CREDIBLE SAFETY OR SECURITY THREAT TO PROTECTED PERSONNEL, FACILITIES, OR ASSETS. THE FAA RECOMMENDS THAT UAS OPERATORS NEEDING TO OPERATE IN THE INDICATED AIRSPACE FOR OVERRIDING REASONS OF PUBLIC INTEREST OR NECESSITY (SUCH AS IN DIRECT SUPPORT OF AN ACTIVE NATIONAL DEFENSE, HOMELAND SECURITY, LAW ENFORCEMENT, FIREFIGHTING, SEARCH AND RESCUE, OR DISASTER RESPONSE MISSION) COORDINATE IN ADVANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE DOD, DHS, DOJ, DOE, OR USCG ENTITY, OR BY CONTACTING THE 2601161905-2710291430 END PART 2 OF 4 FDC 6/4375 FDC PART 3 OF 4 SECURITY NOTICE…NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISORY FOR FAA. DOD, DHS, DOJ, DOE, AND USCG POINTS OF CONTACT FOR SPECIFIC COVERED FACILITIES AND MOBILE ASSETS MAY BE AVAILABLE ON THE FOLLOWING FAA WEBSITE: https://udds-faa.opendata.arcgis.com/. OPERATORS UNABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY COORDINATE WITH DOD, DHS, DOJ, DOE, OR USCG POINTS OF CONTACT MAY CONTACT THE FAA SYSTEM OPERATIONS SUPPORT CENTER (SOSC) AT (202) 267-8276 FOR FURTHER ASSISTANCE. THE FAA APPLIES, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE, SPECIAL SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS (SSI) PURSUANT TO 14 C.F.R. SECTION 99.7 OR OTHER AIRSPACE MEASURES THAT RESTRICT UAS OPERATIONS IN PROXIMITY TO FACILITIES AND MOBILE ASSETS COVERED BY 6 U.S.C. SECTION 124N, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 130I, AND 50 U.S.C. SECTION 2661. HOWEVER, IMPLEMENTING ADVANCED SSI OR OTHER AIRSPACE MEASURES MAY NOT BE FEASIBLE FOR ALL COVERED ASSETS AND MOBILE ASSET OPERATIONS. UAS OPERATORS SHOULD THEREFORE EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN FLYING IN PROXIMITY OF ALL DOD, DHS, DOJ, AND DOE FACILITIES AND MOBILE ASSETS, AND USCG MOBILE ASSETS. IF YOU HAVE GENERAL QUESTIONS REGARDING UAS OPERATIONS, PLEASE REFER 2601161905-2710291430 END PART 3 OF 4 FDC 6/4375 FDC PART 4 OF 4 SECURITY NOTICE…NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISORY FOR TO WWW.FAA.GOV/UAS/CONTACT; OR CONTACT THE FAA VIA EMAIL AT UASHELP@FAA.GOV OR PHONE AT (844) FLY-MY-UA. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING UAS-SPECIFIC SSI, PLEASE REFER TO THE FOLLOWING FAA WEBSITE: https://udds-faa.opendata.arcgis.com/; OR CONTACT THE FAA SOSC AT (202)267-8276. 2601161905-2710291430 END PART 4 OF 4

Good news. Crazy how slowly these actions are coming

Damn, the kids sound cool these days

That’s fair, if something doesn’t work for you move on. I’m pretty happy with proton for now. Eventually I’ll try self hosting.

Ha, sounds about right

You just did pay him attention. And in this specific matter no less.

What tier do you pay for now? Did you ever downgrade your their?

Just downloaded

Deltachat, Matrix, and Session are federated and E2E encrypted, I think.

Why the downvotes?