As an enthusiast that takes portraits, travel, some macro, some wildlife, and a desire to do more sports and birding; I’ve always wanted to upgrade my SL1 to a full frame sensor/mirrorless.

Price is a big deal for me, and I want to buy once cry once–i want a camera that will last me the next 8+ years. Reviews on the RP look great, and I don’t pretend to be an expert–im confused though, because while the R6 mkii has a few nice features I can’t see why it costs twice as much. Is the R6 mkii worth the upgrade, and/or will it be more future proof?

  • pfannkuchen_gesicht
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They did what now?! Source?
    With that in mind I know I won’t be buying Canon…

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was pretty well-documented - here’s one source. Most of the manufacturers have some sort of limits or controls on third-party lenses, usually with patents that should have failed the obviousness test. I believe the state of the mirrorless ecosystem is:

      Third-party AF lenses forbidden:

      • Canon RF

      Third-party lenses approved on a case-by-case basis:

      • Fuji X
      • Fuji GFX
      • Nikon Z

      Open (some may charge a license fee):

      • Sony E
      • Micro four-thirds
      • L-mount