• @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      An argument against you repeating what I said and agreeing with me?

      No, I stand by what I said and you parroted.

      • @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        so… you really do have no argument, huh? You claim that taking state subsidies makes a company state-sponsored.

        I claim that that’s stupid, because it means that Intel and Microsoft would be considered state-sponsored enterprises.

        • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I don’t have an argument against my own argument, no.

          Regardless of what you claim I claim, you’ve already taken my side on all of this.

          Thank you for your support!.

              • @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                So… You don’t have an argument against my argument that isn’t your argument, because you don’t understand the argument?

                • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Incorrect, although you are consistent with your method of pretending someone is saying something they aren’t.

                  Thank you for your continued support

                  • @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    You literally claim without evidence that I am using your argument, despite my argument to the contrary. Sounds like a troll who lost an argument to me.